"Certainly not tragic, not even heroic". How far do you agree with this estimation of the character Macbeth?

Authors Avatar

BRAMAN THILLAINATHAN                                                                                                                                                                        GCSE ENGLISH COURSEWORK

‘CERTAINLY NOT TRAGIC, NOT EVEN HEROIC’

HOW FAR DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS ESTIMATION OF THE CHARACTER MACBETH?

The character Macbeth’s personality undergoes a major upheaval during the play Macbeth. To depict what kind of a person he is entails describing what kind of fluctuations in probity and integrity his character goes through, and what kind of man he is perceived to be throughout the ages and his place in cultured history.

In the First Folio, Macbeth is branded as a definite tragedy. However, Macbeth has spawned a number of works of art, ranging from the operas both entitled Macbeth by Giuseppe Verdi and Ernst Blöch to The Lion King (which is based loosely around Macbeth). This suggests a much deeper and more complex character in Macbeth, not simply a clear cut tyrant or a valiant hero with a tragic flaw that scuppers him despite his best efforts. Therefore, the definition of the Macbeths as a ‘dead butcher and his fiend-like wife’ does not do justice to the multitudinous perspectives from which one must view the Macbeths to get a complete picture of their thought patterns.

When considering whether Macbeth is a hero, it becomes evident that at the start of the play, before we even meet him, he is a successful general, noble and valiant in all he undertakes. This is shown particularly in the Captain’s speech:

                                ‘Doubtful it stood,

                As two swimmers that do cling together

                And choke their art. The merciless Macdonald –

                Worthy to be a rebel, for to that

                The multiplying villainies of nature

                Do swarm upon him – from the Western Isles

                Of kerns and galloglasses is supplied,

                And Fortune on his damned quarrel smiling,

                Show’d like a rebel’s whore. But all’s too weak,

                For brave Macbeth – well he deserves that name –

Join now!

                Disdaining Fortune, with his brandish’d steel

                Which smok’d with bloody execution,

                Like Valour’s minion carv’d out his passage

                Till he fac’d the slave,

                Which ne’er shook hands, nor bade farewell to him.

                Will he unseam’d him from the nave to th’chaps

                And fix’d his head upon our battlements.’

In this speech, the Captain is primarily telling King Duncan of how, despite the fact that fortune and sheer number of forces seemed to heavily favour the rebel movement headed by the traitor Macdonald and supported by the Irish and, as he later says, the Norwegians, Macbeth cut down every ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

The quality of writing in this piece is of an exceptionally high standard for GCSE level. The candidate has demonstrated a command of a large vocabulary, a high standard of grammar and a fluent writing style.

The candidate's analysis is very good in many respects; s/he closely references the text and discusses the use of literary devices and motifs well. The essay could benefit from closer quotation and reference to the text in places, although generally it is good. However, the structural problems I have highlighted above have to be rectified before the literary analysis could be considered useful as it should be used to strengthen an argument not as a substitute for one. It is likely that this candidate studies Latin and/or Greek and as a result has used some of these literary terms in his/her essay. While this can be impressive, it is important to ensure it is done appropriately. The use of the word 'hamartia' (presumably to mean 'tragic flaw') jars somewhat and seems slightly inappropriate as it is a complex term which has attracted a lot of debate on its precise meaning. If you are unsure it is better to express your ideas in plain English rather than using Latin or Greek terminology.

This is a good essay in some respects, in that it achieves a competent character analysis of Macbeth and his motivations, but it does suffer from structural issues. However, the statement given for discussion is 'Certainly not tragic, not even heroic'. The candidate does not discuss these aspects in the main body of the essay, and only really addresses them when drawing his/her conclusions in the final paragraphs. In an essay such as this, it is also important to set the parametres of the discussion, i.e. define 'tragic' and 'heroic', clearly set out an argument for or against the statement (although ideally more nuanced than this), and qualify it with reference to the text and referring back to the original statement. The candidate has failed to do this, thus making their line of argument somewhat difficult to follow.