Compare and Contrast Owen’s ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ and Brooke’s ‘the Soldier’

Authors Avatar

Mohammed Tahir Y11                                                     31 March 2001        

COMPARE AND CONTRAST OWEN’S ‘DULCE ET DECORUM EST’ AND BROOKE’S ‘THE SOLDIER’

The poems ‘Dulce et decorum est’ and ‘The Soldier’ by Wilfred Owen and Rupert Brooke respectively, render images of war that have rather contrasting effects. Brooke foresees his death yet is contempt, while Owen describes others and is frustrated and angered at what he beholds, attacking the lies of the widespread propaganda.

Owen’s portrayal of war comes as a jolt to the average bystander, predominantly comprised of the armchair patriots to whom he mainly concentrates on awakening. He initiates the recount of the trial of courage and heart of the soldiers, with their description as ‘old beggars’ ‘coughing like hags’, trudging through the ‘sludge’, walking ‘asleep’ with an ‘ecstasy of fumbling’. The unnerving description of the sufferings endured in the war and the disjointed rhythm to the poem further captivates our attention, and causes us to be charged with a sense of pity to their inevitable sense of fatalism.

Join now!

The objective of Owen needs no unearthing. When he depicts the scenes of brutal torment and excruciating affliction, he rekindles the reader’s emotions from a somewhat dormant phase into one where sadness and anger are dominant. He describes what he beholds as ‘blood gargling from the froth corrupted lungs | Bitter as the cud | Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues’. Such sad, vile images of nauseating happenings play on the reader’s feelings, truly causing him/her to comprehend to what extent these soldiers are bereft of hope. The reader’s infatuation with life is challenged, for here are people ...

This is a preview of the whole essay