Compare the ways in which Macbeth and Frankenstein are presented as flawed heroes.

Authors Avatar

Compare the ways in which Macbeth and Frankenstein are presented as flawed heroes.

Neither Macbeth or Frankenstein are monsters, in fact at the start of their stories (in a time sense) both show acts of courage and loyalty, this however is destroyed by their vaulting ambitions. Frankenstein is keen to have power over nature, and conquer death by creating life however he creates a monster that should not live, this then destroys his loved ones and eventually Frankenstein. Macbeth also has a huge ambition and moves from a trustworthy valiant warrior to a murderer full of deceit who destroys every threat to become king and remain king. Macbeth by Shakespeare conforms to many of Aristotle’s characteristics of a tragic hero, where the hero starts heroic but has a major flaw which destroys him. Whereas Frankenstein is created on the back of fears to Galvanism in the 19th century and the main character is the representative of the scientists.

The structure of Frankenstein makes it evident that his tale will be a cautionary one as he retells the story of his misguided mission. Frankenstein can be viewed as a flawed character from the start as he is seen through Walton’s eyes as a destroyed being which is emphasized when compared to the monster. Walton describes Frankenstein on “the brink of destruction”, and describes how he “never saw a man in so wretched a condition.” This in comparison to the monster who Frankenstein is meant to be chasing is shocking, “gigantic structure” who was making “rapid progress”. From the start of the book we know that the hero Frankenstein will slowly be destroyed by his own creation, while the monster will stay strong. However although Walton sees him shattered in both body and mind he views Frankenstein as “a noble creature” much like Macbeth at the start of the book is seen as a “worthy gentlemen” and “noble Macbeth”. However the contrast between the two figures at the start is huge while Macbeth was in his prime Frankenstein had seen “better days”. Shakespeare has delayed Macbeth’s entrance to establish him through other people’s eyes as a military hero who seems entirely trust worthy and a military hero. Duncan describes Macbeth as a “valiant cousin” and gave Macbeth a “smack of honour” and tributes him by giving him the title of “Thane of Cawdor”. This makes Macbeth seem completely loyal to the king and makes his betrayal seem worse as the King had honoured Macbeth and trusted him.

Join now!

Both Frankenstein and Macbeth have idealistic ambitions which although they succeeded in lead to their downfall. Frankenstein has an ambition to have power over nature, over life and death, to create a living being from lifeless material, a super hero of the humans, who is not only bigger and stronger than the rest but also the most beautiful. Frankenstein had “selected his features as beautiful” with “luxurious black hair” and “pearly white teeth”, however this made the monster seem all the worse “a more horrid contrast with his watery eyes”. The eyes are meant to be the soul of a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay