"Compare the ways in which "on the idle hill" and "The destruction of Sennacherib" portrays images of war".

Authors Avatar

Adam Hall Yr10

“Compare the ways in which “on the idle hill” and “The destruction of Sennacherib” portrays images of war”.

The structure of these 2 poems are similar but comparisons can be made between “On the idle hill” and “The destruction of Sennacherib” Although the content is similar the title, tone, language, devices, structure and punctuation are very different.

In the early 1800’s when Byron wrote “The destruction of Sennacherib” a large war campaign was occurring; The Napoleonic Wars. The wars surrounding him would effect his view on war. In the late 1800’s when Housman wrote “On the idle hill”, no major battle was occurring. However, ironically within 20 years of this poem more “lads” were being sent to the slaughter in World War One.

The titles of the two poems are very different. “On the idle hill” portrays a very passive image, whereas “Destruction of Sennacherib” is very active. Byron’s poem is a stereotype of war. The title shows action and it brings a sense of all encompassing. Whereas “On the idle hill” shows laziness as “idle” personifies the hill making the start of the poem peaceful and natural. This image contradicts war, which is very ironic.

Join now!

The two poems by Byron and Housman portray war. “On the idle hill” is a very natural affair. “The Destruction of Sennacherib” is a very violent and graphic event. Both of the poems show the beginning and the end of the battle and misses out the actual war. This firstly leaves the battle to the readers imagination so it can be interpreted differently, and secondly it makes the reader concentrate of the consequences. Although Byron’s poem doesn’t show the battle it has a brutal and horrific image of the aftermath, “the foam of his gasping lay white on the turf.” ...

This is a preview of the whole essay