Comparing two poems about Seduction.

Authors Avatar

Comparing two poems about

Seduction

The poem “To His Coy Mistress”, by Andrew Marvell written in the seventeenth century describes the attempts of a man to seduce “His Mistress”, he does this by complimenting her, by making promises and by generally trying to charm his way into having sex with his “Mistress”.  The second poem “ The Seduction” by Eileen McAuley was written in the mid nineteen eighties.  The poem tells the story from the eyes of a young, innocent, naive sixteen-year-old girl.  Who after a party, was seduced by a boy who took advantage of her after getting her drunk, the reminder poem tells the story of how the girl dealt with the consequences of her pregnancy. Marvell although writing in a different style at the time of the writing of the poem, portrays the male character in a similar way to Eileen McAuley.  Both poets do this by describing the male figure as the one who is trying to cheat the female into having sex with him.  In the “Seduction” the male character is successful in doing this but in “To His Coy Mistress” we do not hear if the male character is successful, but by doing this Marvell creates an atmosphere of tension and disappointment.  A difference between the two poems is that the poem “To His Coy Mistress” is directed towards his mistress and deals with the seduction as its main point concentrating on before the seduction, not the after effects like the poem “ The Seduction” does.

In the opening stanza Marvell uses persuasive language and somewhat devious tone to try and excuse why he is talking with pace, and not being patient “World enough and Time”.  He also uses the conditional verb to try and say that the two of them belong together “We would sit down” this last phrase also creates a romantic atmosphere, Marvell does this a second time “our long Loves Day” he is pushing the fact that they belong together.  He even tries to woow her with compliments and by comparing her to the “Indian Ganges”, were she would find “Rubies”.  But he compares himself to a dreary, unspectacular river, to make his mistress feel important, he also says that if his mistress was to refuse him that he would wait for eternity for her, “Till the Conversion of the Jews”.  Marvell describes the male characters love for his mistress as “vegetable love” to give the impression that it grows quickly and yet will blossom into a thing “vaster than Empires” this gives the impression that the male’s love is genuine and not a rushed relationship.  The male character praises his mistress physically, because the following stanza describes how this beautiful body of hers is getting older all the time is moving on.

Join now!

In the beginning of the second stanza, Marvell suddenly increases the pace of the poem to show how time is moving on.  He increases the pace by shortening the beat, and by choosing words of fewer syllables “Times winged Charriot hurrying near:” This extract emphasises the fact that time is passing quickly, and possibly that the male is becoming impatient.  Marvell also creates images of how his mistress is also ageing, and that he is becoming less attracted to her “Thy Beauty shall no more be found”.  Marvell once again creates a clear picture in ones mind of how, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay