Consider the end of Millers play A View from the Bridge. How effectively does the final scene conclude the drama?

Authors Avatar

Consider the end of Miller’s play ‘A View from the Bridge’. How effectively does the final scene conclude the drama?

‘A View from the Bridge’ provides the inevitable ending of a traditional Greek tragedy, where in this case Eddie’s inability to make a concession eventually results in his deserved death; although tragic, this is necessary to conclude the story.

As a lawyer, we immediately trust Alfieri to be a good judge of character as well as rational. Along side this we watch Alfieri oversee the whole play and watch it ‘run it’s bloody course’ whilst acting as the commentator throughout the story Which leave him in some sense, acting as the bridge; seeing both the darker side (Redhook) and the somewhat innocent side (Manhattan) but he links the two together. He is the only character that predicts the outcome of Eddies and Marco’s actions and, thus tries compassionately to stop them from committing further insult to one another.

 In Alfieri’s opening monologue he uses words like ‘disaster’ and states that Eddie was ‘unable to settle for half’, which consequently, results in his ‘bloody’ death. The audience could also relate this story line to Vinny Bolzano’s, where he was severely punished for ‘snitching’ on his immigrant family, which sadly resulted in him being thrown down the stairs ‘head bouncin’ like a coconut’, this would indicate to the audience that Eddies actions in the future could cause such an outcome or worse. The tale of Vinny was told by both Beatrice and Eddie, directed at Catherine. This is ironic seen as Eddie turns out to be the ‘snitch’ in the end and went against the law of his Italian community and faith. Another clue towards the conclusion of the play is the setting, Red hook, which was a dangerous place where its residents ‘pay no regards to the law set’ which could result in death for doing the right thing, therefore Eddie could be seen as the ‘good guy’ by laying the law, but when doing so he went against his faith and family belief.

Join now!

Respect was an important factor in an Italian community, we see this when Eddie demands for Marco to ‘give him his name back’, the fact that Marco has disgraced Eddie in front of the whole community by spitting in his face, causes him to lash out and  ‘stand his ground’ as the man of the house.  At the beginning of the play Eddie was a well respected gentleman in the neighborhood, this respect was instantly lost when he appeared to have snitched on his own family, despite being warned by Alfieri not long before, this urged him to appear ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Quality of Writing Spelling, grammar and punctuation are all of a high standard in this essay. The candidate's quality of written communication is excellent, with the candidate expressing his/her ideas concisely and clearly. Some quotations could be better integrated into sentences so that they flow better, for example "Eddie automatically questions his sexual orientation: ‘He’s like a chorus girl’ and instantly feeling superior" the colon could be removed and the quotation made more of a part of the sentence. The "instantly feeling superior" is also grammatically wrong - but this is such a minor error that it would not affect the candidate's mark, however, candidates should always proofread work before submitting it, to give off a better overall impression.

Level of Analysis The level of analysis in this essay is very high. The candidate quotes directly from the text to provide evidence and support his/her arguments. However, the candidate then goes on to explain how and why the quote is relevant and supports the point they have made, and this is the key skill needed for high marks, which is demonstrated so well in this essay. Particularly good examples include the fifth paragraph (Although he appears the ‘nice guy’...), and this paragraph is also an example of going beyond the text to reference other works or influences on the writer, in this case the Pieta.

Response to Question Although this question focuses on the end of the play, it would be impossible to discuss whether the final scene is effective in concluding the drama without examining the rest of the play and how different parts of it are dealt with in the climax and close of the play. It is also arguable that as this is a two-act play, the "final scene" essentially covers half of the play, although the exact definition of "scene" could be much narrower and only include the very final part of the play. The candidate's answer is very strong, considering different points in the play and how they are resolved or mirrored at the end of the play and provides a substantial answer to the question.