Disagreeing with Clarkson's article "Stuff the tiger",

Authors Avatar by elowenwengmailcom (student)

Elowen Jiang[Type text]6782

Dear editor,

After reading the Clarkson’s article, I know that  in his point of view, human beings do not have the responsibility to protect tigers. Obviously, that’s false. I totally disagree with his view. Protecting the animal resources and keeping the ecological balance matter the human beings existence and development. So, In my opinion, protecting tigers is an unshirkable duty for every earthling.


“As the population of China becomes more wealthy, demand for illegal tiger parts is booming.” That is the first sentence of his article.

So, we know that Clarkson’ s first reason is that tigers provide business. Honestly that’s truth because people need to make money to fees families clothe and shelter themselves survive.

However, killing tigers is illegal. Making profit by killing tigers is wrong. There is a slogan I have been hearing for quit some time, “If the buying stops, the selling will stops” The use of endangered tiger products and their medicines is seen as a symbol of high status and wealth.

Join now!

Nowadays, developed medical treatment could help people to cure their illness. Why do we need to kill tigers or other animals?

In addition, it is no exaggeration to say that in some counties, tiger parts are a delicacy that is served at special private banquets. The rising demand for tiger parts and rapid increase in price of tiger bone continues to be an irresistible incentive to poachers. By killing the tigers, we not only harm tigers, but also ourselves. The tiger thus becomes the symbol for the protection of all species on our earth since it is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay