Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of Love his play Romeo and Juliet

Authors Avatar

Discuss Shakespeare’s presentation of Love in this play

Love is portrayed in Romeo and Juliet purely by the characters Shakespeare has created. This loveless society is primarily formed by the Capulets and the Montagues, two feuding families neck and neck with hate with each other, who do not even know where the hate originated from. In the end Romeo and Juliet’s love for each other conquers the hate and the two families are united in grief, this ends the feud so the families no longer hate each other but this came at the price of the death, of two innocent lovers. Perhaps this was the only way the feud would end. The term ‘loveless society’ implies that Verona was a city where there is no love, that it cannot happen. We are then told the story of Romeo and Juliet, and we see two lovers changing this society, with their true love for each other. In the play Romeo and Juliet are the only characters who show a ‘true-love passion’, that is strong. Other characters only have parental love, like Capulet. Even his love for Juliet is shallow as he does not take into account her feelings. Also Paris thinks he is in love with Juliet, despite not even meeting her, only members of her family. This is another example of shallow love. Until the very end of the play, the two families are fighting, losing their lives over their dispute. Even Romeo, one of the characters who shows love, resorts to violence and kills Tybalt, as a result of rage and perhaps revenge; although this was driven by his love for Mercutio. Before he kills Tybalt he wants to make peace with him, this is thrown back at him, and his rage from Tybalt killing Mercutio overtakes him and he kills Tibult; this shows love can make people do many things, even murder.

Verona is a Catholic society. This is foregrounded in films such as Luhrmann’s version of ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and yet there is hatred between the two families. Even the servants are affected and are willing to fight for their families. The contrast between the loveless society and the hope for peace presented by love is made evident from the first act, with a fight between servants from the two households. They care so much about this feud that they are willing to fight, even in public places.  Love is presented here because Sampson, a Capulet servant, talks of raping the Montague women:

‘Tis true, and therefore women being the weaker vessels

Are ever thrust to the wall: therefore I will push

Montague’s men from the wall and therefore thrust his maids to

The wall.’

His attitude to love is that it is a physical, violent and sexual thing. He says that he will rape the Montague women. Even this action may not be of love, but of hate. As the fight is about to start, Benvolio (a Montague) arrives, his desire to end this feud is shown here and he is revealed as a peacemaker. Then Tybalt arrives. He is almost an opposite of Benvolio. He wants this feud to carry on and almost craves fights with the Montagues. In Luhrmann’s version of the play this is also evident as he carries two guns inscribed with ‘Capulet’ and wears clothes like a Wild West gun slinger, showing he is always ready for a fight. Benvolio calls for peace, but Tybalt insults and expresses his hate for the Montagues and calls him a coward:

‘What! Drawn, and then talk of peace? I hate the word,

As I hate hell, all Montagues and thee.

Have at thee coward!”’

His words here suggest there is no way that this confrontation is going to end without a fight, and shows that his desire is no less than killing and death. Tybalt almost laughs at the idea of peace and sees it as the actions of a coward. He expresses hate for the Montagues and shows signs that this feud will never end. Tybalt again shows the ability of the loveless society to consume those who hate death and violence when he is killed by Romeo, who is fuelled with revenge after Tybalt kills Mercutio. Before this however, Romeo offers peace to Tybalt, and love for him as a cousin, but Tybalt only insults him; and even Mercutio is shocked at Romeo for this. Romeo is interrupted by insults from both Mercutio and Tybalt:

  ‘Romeo, the love is bear thee can afford

No better term than this: thou are a villain.’

Join now!

Romeo then answers back to Tybalt by saying:

  ‘I do protest I never injured thee, But love thee

Better than thou canst devise,

Till thou shalt know the reason of my love:

And, so good Capulet, which name I tender

As dearly as mine own, be satisfied.’

Mercutio is shocked when Romeo says this. He then interrupts and says:

   O calm, dishonourable, vile submission!

‘Alla stocatta’ carries it away.

Tybalt, you rat-catcher, will you walk?

This shows again that everyone is far too involved in this feud ...

This is a preview of the whole essay