Discuss the Premise that it is Solely Macbeth's Fault that he falls.

Authors Avatar

Varun Sivabalan                                                                                                     Page         

Discuss the Premise that it is Solely Macbeth’s Fault that he falls

At the beginning of the play Macbeth is admired by everyone for his courage, and even is king honours his loyalty. By the time he meets his death he has become a murderous tyrant, hated and feared by everyone. What causes this change? Is it his fault alone, or are there other factors involved? In this essay I shall examine the role played by Duncan and his sons, the English, Macduff, Banquo, the witches and Lady Macbeth and try to assess how far they too caused Macbeth’s fall.  

The first being Duncan’s personality, there is no doubt that he was a trusting man. At the beginning of the play he says of the dead Thane of Cawdor, “…There is no art to find the mind’s construction in the face. He was a gentleman whom I built an absolute trust…” and he goes on, mistakenly to put exactly the same trust in Macbeth, by inviting himself to stay at Macbeth’s house. If he had not done this, Macbeth would have found it much more difficult to murder him.

Another factor that helped Macbeth to become king was the behaviour of Duncan’s sons Malcolm and Donaldbain. If hey had not been scared and run away immediately after the murder, “…the nea’er in blood, the nearer bloody…”, it is hard to see how Macbeth could have become king so easily. In fact, it is strange that Macbeth and his wife did not consider what they would do if the princes had stayed. This statement supports the fact that eponymous Macbeth is the creation of a writer (William Shakespeare). Shakespeare wanted to make money and entertain so he made the play interesting by twisting it with real history and mention witches to please the King at that time (James IV). Because in real life Macbeth was the good guy and Banquo was the treacherous one, but King James IV was a descendant of Banquo so Shakespeare reversed the story. Shakespeare also in effect taught the audience about over-ambition. So there are two authorial purposes: didactic, and to entertain. He entertainment factor is derived from the ‘Aristotelian Theory of Tragedy’. This is compared to a circle, where one (Macbeth) becomes higher up in the chain of being (Macbeth becomes King). But then more murders follow to hold that position (the murders of Banquo and Macduff’s family). But then at the end, sympathy is evoked for the fallen one (when Macbeth recognises himself as soldier and fights till the end).

The English also played their part in destroying Macbeth, because if they had not fought against him, in support of Malcolm, the battle in which Macbeth dies could not have taken place. The English also in effect confirm the third apparition that Great Birnam Wood moves to high Dunsinane hill, when the English disguise themselves in woods.

Join now!

Macduff, returning with the English army obviously has a key role as he physically caused Macbeth’s death. One could also argue that his decision on not to turn up for Macbeth’s coronation (“…Will you to Scone?”, “…No cousin I’ll to Fife…”) sours the seeds of Macbeth’s hatred of him which later expresses itself in the horrific murder of his family. “How sayst thou that Macduff denies his person at our great bidding?” This comment from the play shows Macbeth’s reaction to Macduff’s snub.

Macduff’s family contrasts to Macbeth’s family. Macduff has children whereas Macbeth hasn’t. Macbeth is terrified ...

This is a preview of the whole essay