Discuss the presentation of Big Brother in '1984'. Refer in

Authors Avatar

Alex Gill

         Discuss the presentation of Big Brother in '1984'. Refer in

              Detail to Orwell's use of language in your answer.

          Big Brother plays a huge part in the society of Oceania. Orwell introduces Big Brother in the second paragraph; he does this by describing a poster with the supposed face of Big Brother. The face has a striking appearance: a man with black hair, black moustache and eyes that are hypnotic with the uncanny knack of following you around. Below the face were the words 'BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU'. The face and the words combined make you feel frightened and uneasy, thinking that this man is watching you day and night, while the term 'brother' suggests a cozy, comrade-like companion. This could not be farther from the truth. In essence, Big Brother is a god-like being who dominates his followers. This poster is much like the recruitment poster of 1914 on which Lord Kitchener, the Secretary of War declared 'Your Country Needs YOU!'

           Orwell Uses Big Brother as a symbol of powerful dictators, such as Stalin, Hitler, Franco and Mussolini. Big Brother's role in society could be described as a kind of religious god because Big Brother is followed by many, yet no one has ever seen him which is similar to nearly all of today's religious gods, who are worshipped and followed by many but again they have never been seen. For party members he has the power to incite devotion, but he is also used as the ultimate threat because if his followers stray from his leadership they will be tortured or even 'vaporized'.

Join now!

           For the Proles Big Brother is a distant authority figure. The Proles are explained as free people, 'Proles and animals are free'. They are at the bottom of society which gives them more freedom than members of the Outer Party, like Winston for example. This is because they are said to not have the intelligence to rebel against Big Brother. There are Thought Police who patrol throughout the district, which eliminates anyone who shows political tendencies. Overall the surroundings are repulsive where crime of every sort is overflowing. Despite what Winston believes it is hard ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

This essay lacks structure. The introduction doesn't really pose an argument, and just gives some background information to Big Brother in the novel. This is fine, but there needs to be a discussion of how Big Brother is presented, and look in detail at language being a technique as the question suggests. A strong argument posed in the introduction will ensure you stay on focus throughout. There is no conclusion here, other than a simple statement saying the reader see him as "mysterious". This is incredibly basic at GCSE level and it's a shame that no better conclusion could be made, as this question has so many avenues which can be explored. Spelling, punctuation and grammar are fine. It was a shame to see much of this essay write as if the characters and novel is real. Saying "Winston does not agree with what Big Brother and the Party say" suggests that you have misinterpreted that the novel is in fact constructed by Orwell for a reason.

The analysis here is lacking, as mentioned above. What is particularly striking about this essay is the amount of narration. For example, the paragraph "Winston does not agree with what Big Brother and the Party say about changing history, but he plays the role of a devoted party member" is appalling in the context of this essay. It adds nothing relevant to the argument, and there is no analysis whatsoever. Sentences simply retell what the story is, and don't look at how Orwell constructs Big Brother to have a specific effect. I would advise you structure your sentences as "Orwell has Big Brother appear omniscient to make the reader fear his power". By looking at Orwell's constructs, you will naturally begin to answer the question of why he uses such techniques, looking further into the effect on the reader and the strength of his techniques. Simply retelling the plot will gain you no credit, so it is vital you begin to analyse language, form and structure. The little analysis I could find "Like much of Orwell’s writing in '1984', opposites are used" is unfortunately not relevant whatsoever to how Big Brother is portrayed. You really need to stay on focus with the task to reach the top bands, else the examiner will simply write "not relevant" in the margin - no matter how good your analysis is, you will gain little to no credit for answering a different question. Beware of writing an answer to a question you want, rather than what is actually there!

This essay engages averagely with the task. There is a strong focus on how Big Brother is part of the plot, rather than looking at the techniques which Orwell uses to present him. Some of the points are good, looking at his similarities to common dictators, but there needs to be significantly more analysis of the language used and the way Big Brother is central to the structure. When the questions asks you to discuss, there needs to be some exploration of why Orwell chooses to present his as terrifying, or why he has him become so mysterious. There is no overarching argument here, and other than saying "we wonder whether he is in face real" there is little discussion of the reader response. To reach the top bands, there must be a sustained focus on how the reader responds and interprets the texts because of Orwell's techniques.