Discussion of Macbeth - An Introduction

Authors Avatar

Shezad Chowdhury 10P

Written around 1606, ‘Macbeth’ is regarded as a generous tribute to the current monarch at the time, King James I. In 1603, the first year of his reign , King James privileged Shakespeare’s theatre company, above all others, to be the King’s Men. Shakespeare’s theatre company was extremely honoured by the title and ‘Macbeth’ was written in an attempt at expressing Shakespeare’s gratitude.

Before he was King James I of England, he was King James VI of Scotland. Therefore, as a tribute play it would make sense to set the play in Scotland. It also seems appropriate that this play features witches and witchcraft. King James loathed witches and women, so Shakespeare displayed negative images of women, through the three witches and Lady Macbeth, mainly by illustrating their ability to control and manipulate men.

Regicide and political murders are crucial to this play, so are they prominent in the life of King James too as a serious attempt at his life was taken in 1605 with Guy Fawkes’ gunpowder plot, to blow up the Parliament with King James inside it. The play would also appeal to the society at the time as there was anxiety about killing the King.  

Shakespeare also explores the topic of kingship and loyalty. They were of great importance to King James. His father, Lord Darnley was murdered and his mother, Mary Queen of Scots, had been executed as a traitor. Hence, inquiries of the role of a monarch were always on his mind.  

Other possible intentions include showing the fight between good and evil, showing the relationships between humans and the supernatural, exploring the psychology of ambition and the implications of someone being driven into an inevitable doom.  

In the start of the play, Macbeth, Thane of Glamis achieves Thane of Cawdor through his unparalleled bravery and prowess in a recent war to squelch a rebellion led in part by the traitorous Thane of Cawdor. This causes the audience’s first impressions of Macbeth to be fairly optimistic, because we admire and have a high regard for people who fight so heroically in the name of the King. But, when Macbeth informs his wife of the witches prophecies, and she concludes that they should murder King Duncan, he refuses to do so. The audience would certainly appreciate such loyalty and we will like him further. Nevertheless, Lady Macbeth convinces him to go through with it and after he has murdered Duncan the audience’s liking for Macbeth would reduce enormously. When Macbeth fears the consequences and regrets what he has done, we feel slightly sympathetic towards him and our view of him becomes slightly more positive than straight after the murder. Macbeth succeeds the Throne, but the audience does not respect and value him like the good King Duncan, instead we hate him and hope that his deeds are discovered and he dies, so equilibrium is restored in the world and everything runs properly. Thereafter, when Macbeth instructs two murderers to assassinate Banquo and his son Fleance, we feel as though Macbeth is employing others to do his dirty work, which is cunning and clever, yet cowardly. During the feast Macbeth twice sees the ghost of Banquo focusing on him, which causes him to almost blurt out his guilt. Here, the audience’s view of Macbeth is low and we wish that Macbeth ‘spills the beans’, so his crime against the King and therefore God is discovered. When the English army marches towards his fortress, Macbeth displays a feeling of defiance. The audience may interpret this as arrogance. Yet, we may also admire his willingness to fight to the death. When Macbeth meets Macduff, our view of him has turned from optimistic in the start of the play to pessimistic at the end, by which point we approve of his death.

Macbeth can be viewed as a tragic figure if he is driven into a fate he cannot control, if he lacks one virtue which destroys him or if he has a fatal weakness.

Act one scene seven succeeds Duncan’s arrival at Macbeth’s castle and involves Macbeth’s debate over whether he should kill Duncan. At the outset of the scene, during the preparation of Duncan’s banquet, Macbeth, in his soliloquy ponders the matter of assassinating Duncan. If there were no consequences to his act, he would do it. But in doing so, as he comprehends would be murdering his own liege and guest, which would come back to haunt him, “return to plague th’inventor ” and ultimately block his way into heaven, “will plead like angels, trumpet-tongued, against the deep damnation of his taking-off”.

Besides, Macbeth declares that Duncan has been such a virtuous leader that the very heavens would object and come down to tell everyone who killed him, “heaven’s cherubim…shall blow the horrid deed in every eye”. Here, the imagery of his thoughts demoralizes his reasons, because as he regards Duncan’s virtues, he imagines “cherubim” and “angels” seeking revenge for his murder. Shakespeare uses such biblical imagery to emphasize the enormity of his sin.

This impression of sin lingering on his mind is confirmed when Macbeth avoids using the word ‘murder’, by substituting it with “surcease” or “blow”. This also suggests his reluctance to commit the crime. The repetitions of “done it” are euphemisms for the murder about to take place. The soliloquy is a device used to reveal Macbeth’s thoughts. Macbeth’s speech shows us his disturbed, divided and unstable mind, which makes him a complex character. Seeing as Macbeth’s intricate character has a conscience, the play is much more exciting than if he were a normal murderer without a conscience. Additionally, it is interesting for such a trustworthy comrade as Macbeth to think about becoming King. Duncan would never suspect loyal Macbeth. This makes the play more appealing to the audience, who would be caught in the suspense of whether he will kill Duncan, especially after recent attempts of murdering King James I.

Join now!

Nonetheless, Macbeth explains that as Duncan’s host he should protect, rather than attack him, “as his host, who should against his murderer shut the door”.  Macbeth says specifically, his only incentive is ambition, which is like a rider who tries to vault into the saddle, but jumps too far and falls on the other side,

“ I have no spur

To prick the sides of my intent, but only

Vaulting ambition, which o’erleaps itself

And falls on the other.”

This acknowledgement comes after he has considered all the good reasons for not murdering Duncan ...

This is a preview of the whole essay