Do you agree that Wuthering Heights repeatedly offers moral judgements and condemnations of Heathcliff?

Authors Avatar

 Do you agree that Wuthering Heights repeatedly offers moral judgements and condemnations of Heathcliff?

        Many people would agree that Heathcliff is the most controversial and complex character in ‘Wuthering Heights’, yet can we make a fair judgement about him. It is hard if the book repeatedly offers it’s own moral judgements (usually in the form of Nelle Dean’s self-righteous comments) and blatant condemnations. It is easy to be blinded by these and therefore unable to look any further in to the motives and passion that drive Heathcliff.

        Throughout the book we see Heathcliff responsible for terrible deeds. He could easily be interpreted as an unrelenting force of evil, due to the many demonic and wild animal-like descriptions of him; ‘He howled, not like a man, but like a savage beast.’

        Heathcliff beats Hindley, so much so that he is probably responsible for his death. It seems almost impossible to have any sympathy or even respect for a man who ‘kicked and trampled’ on Hindley when he had ‘fallen senseless with excessive pain’ and therefore could not defend himself. But this is only one of many, Heathcliff also beats Isabella and keeps Cathy and Nelle as prisoners at the Heights. On a lesser level, Heathcliff hangs Isabella’s dog and kills some young chicks by putting a cage over them so that they couldn’t be fed. This, though is actually maybe more disturbing than his beating of Hindley or Isabella due to the base nature of the act of wanting to harm something so helpless and innocent.

        Heathcliff continues this trend of taking anger and vengeance out on those that are innocent, by treating the ‘second generation’ abysmally. He forces Cathy to work for him at the Heights, demands that Linton stay at Wuthering Heights where he is sure to die due to his cruel treatment only so that he may gain Thrushcross Grange. Also, he brings up Hareton as a little barbarian and turns him against his father. It seems that Charlotte Brontë is justified in saying that ‘Heathcliff…never once swerving in his arrow straight course to perdition.’ But why did Charlotte Brontë decided to take this view of Heathcliff? If she isolated his actions, like I have done above, then her statement can not be argued with. Undoubtedly her opinion is also due to the way Heathcliff was described by various narrators.

        From the very onset of the book Nelle refers to Heathcliff as a ‘sullen’ child.  She makes no mention of his irrepressible energy and love for Cathy, instead referring to their relationship as ‘Miss Cathy and he were very thick’, making it seem that their partnership had one purpose only – to cause destruction.

        Almost as soon as we are introduced to Heathcliff, we are told by Nelle that ‘Hindley hated him, and to say the truth, I did the same’. Therefore, we are immediately turned against him, because our narrator, the presence that will guide us through the book, dislikes him, and therefore everything she says will be tinted by this view. Especially as we take into account that she is talking with hindsight and we realise that she could have mentioned that she was wrong in her view of him, as she does not we can only conclude that she never changed her opinion of Heathcliff, which is undoubtedly shown by her statement;

        ‘He complained so seldom, indeed, of such stirs as these, that I really though him not vindictive. I was deceived, completely, as you will hear.”                - Page 40

        Therefore, even if we grow to like Heathcliff, we will feel that we too are being deceived and hence cannot trust our own opinion.

        Heathcliff is always seen as a destructive element. He upsets the Earnshaws by turning Hindley against his father and later Hareton against his father, and he upsets the marriage between the Earnshaws and Lintons. Nothing he does produces a good effect and therefore it is possible to feel that Heathcliff is evil even as a child;

        ‘….from the very beginning he bred bad feeling in the house’- Page 38

        Mr Earnshaw is never thanked by Heathcliff for being looked after; in fact he seems to take it as a right. It is understandable that Hindley dislikes him because in the early years it was Heathcliff that treated Hindley as though he were below him, or rather, not as important as him, clearly demonstrated when their father bought them horses;

        ‘…Heathcliff took the handsomest but it soon fell lame…’You must exchange horses with me; I don’t like mine, and if you don’t I shall tell your father of the three thrashings that you gave me.’

        Above Heathcliff even uses blackmail, therefore we could almost say that receiving a beating from Hindley was a benefit to him, which he took good advantage of.

Join now!

        Hindley’s childhood could be said to have been as bad as Heathcliff’s and in fact it was due to Heathcliff because Hindley ‘had learnt to regard his father as an oppressor rather than a friend, and Heathcliff as an usurper of his parents affections, and his privileges.’ Heathcliff never takes this into account, that he destroyed Hindley’s life as a child, without much effort, which would have hurt Hindley even more. But Heathcliff is unrelenting with his vengeance and has not one sympathetic thought for Hindley as he wastes his adult life with drink;

        ‘…He delighted to witness Hindley degrading ...

This is a preview of the whole essay