Paying particular attention to two or more sequences, explore how successfully Costner has portrayed civilization and savagery in the video Dances with Wolves
Paying particular attention to two or more sequences, explore how successfully Costner has portrayed civilization and savagery in the video "Dances with Wolves". We started off by watching the video ''Dances with wolves''. The plot of this story is of an American soldier who got posted to a camp but on his arrival there was no one in sight. John Dumbar still set up camp and waited, and he started his diary. He befriended a wolf, which he named Twosocks and he became friends with an Indian tribe The Sioux. The Indians saw John Dumbar dancing with the wolf one day and as he became a trusted friend they gave him the name of ''Dances with wolves''. One of the sequences that caught my eye which portrayed civilization and savagery is the killing of Twosocks by the soldiers, Kevin Costner has made this sequence very long so that it would make a bigger impact on you and in the way you see the American army. They use Twosocks as a shooting target, they do not under stand that the wolf wants to be near Dances with wolves out of instinctive loyalty. Prior to this sequence John Dumbar had gone back to his camp to find that the soldiers have arrived, and because Dumbar has exchanged some of his clothing as gifts and he has received some back he is mistaken as an Indian and shot off his horse. When the soldiers run up to Dumbar and realise that he is a soldier, they take him into the
American Literature
Soniat, Elizabeth Ms. Hagood American Literature 22 November 2003 Finding Courage John Quincy Adams once said, "Courage and perseverance have a magical talisman, before which difficulties disappear and obstacles vanish into air." At the age of eleven I was riding horses without a fear in the world. Twice a week since I was five I had been riding, so naturally I thought it was easy and there was nothing to it. However, one day my instructor informed me that I would be learning to jump that day. My heart probably skipped a beat with both fear and excitement. It was nothing but a small pole, hardly six inches off the ground; nevertheless, my heart pounded. As I approached the pole a million thoughts went through my head, but the most important was the last one, "I'm going to do this". John Quincy Adams was right; the obstacle in front of me disappeared when I found courage. As soon as I cleared the jump I was ecstatic and wanted nothing more than to do it again. Years later I was still advancing in my riding, finding new obstacles to overcome. I now jumped three feet rather than the miniscule inches I had been so nervous about a few years ago. However, now there was a new challenge; it was raining and wet in the arena and I was attempting a higher jump than before. As I took the turn before the jump, I hardly felt anything going wrong. Suddenly I was in the mud along
How have John Pilger and Tony Parsons used language to persuade the reader to sympathize with their point of view?
How have John Pilger and Tony Parsons used language to persuade the reader to sympathize with their point of view? The national figure for homelessness is a staggering 169000 people, 80000 of them in London alone. Tony Parsons and John Pilger are two men with different views on this crisis. Tony Parsons strictly believes that the beggars are worthless individuals who beg for no acceptable reason whereas John Pilger is far more sympathetic and believes it's not their fault that these people sleep rough. Tony parsons and I share some same beliefs about the beggars. It is unbelievable the way the beggars come up to you asking for loose change. They're not at all ashamed of their 'profession'. I agree with parsons who argues it is acceptable to beg if you've got a leg missing or if you're seriously sick, but young and healthy people who don't try to make something out of their lives are worth none of our pity. John Pilger doesn't seem to understand that begging should not be tolerated. He should know that beggars who live by sponging of decent hard working people for their money should be ignored and encouraged not to beg. John Pilger article "The man with no name" has a story like title. The way he begins his article is just like an opening to a story. Comparing Pilger's title with Parson's you see that Tony parsons is way more insulting. "Beggars of Britain" The word
Brave New World Essay
Amy Lau 12th May 2007 0L Brave New World Persuasive Speech Ladies and Gentlemen, close your eyes and place yourself in a place where technology and machinery beyond your wildest dreams are in your very possession. Imagine a world where no conflict and wars take place; everyone is happy. Imagine yourself living in a haven where everything to suit your needs are available whenever you wish. Imagine yourself in Brave New World... Uniqueness will greet you at the very gates of our society. A completely different and better world compared to your present world. 'How and why?' you ask. Everyone is happy in Brave New World; everyone is satisfied. There will be no more thoughts of envy or jealously, no more feelings of disappointment or sadness, just happiness and contentment. Citizens of our world are conditioned to be satisfied with their rank and class. Due to this, conflicts will be avoided and thus, fighting and war will be a thing of the past. What is one of the main things people fear? The answer: Old age. In your world, it is considered normal to see old citizens walking down the street with hunched backs, rotting teeth and vulnerable to diseases. Would you want to stay healthy and in shape as the years pass by? The citizens of Brave New World will have an artificially balanced equilibrium, transfusions of young blood and of course, the prevention of diseases
Who's Irish?
Effie Rozanitis ENG 102/Cavanaugh Summary Essay January 24, 2003 Who's Irish? Who's Irish? Is a witty and relatable story of two different cultures having a common bond of a little girl, Sophie. The characters of this short story are individuals that constitute the narrators outcome. The grandmother, who is this sixty-eight year old Chinese born widow is a fierce, traditional and broken English spoken woman of certain beliefs. Her daughter Natalie, is a Chinese-American woman who like her mother is fierce is married to John Shea, a depressed, out of work man of Irish decent. Both Natalie and John have a three year old little girl, Sophie. Sophie is a smart, wild and stubborn little girl that doesn't want to listen to anyone. Along with this happy little family is Bess. Bess is John's mother, a quiet and peaceful woman that needs female company and gets along with her the other grandmother. The point of view of this story is told through the grandmother. The grandmother's disregard for the Irish is constant obstacle that she faces throughout the story. She finds that Sophie is too wild and is not "a Chinese girl I ever see" Sophie's wild streak of taking off her clothes at the park, kicking other mothers and blatantly disobeying her grandmother is a shock and thinks that it stems from Sophie's other decent of being Irish. As the story unfolds, the grandmother
Analyse the linguistic and structural methods by which Huxley conveys the beliefs, practises and social issues raised in Chapter Three of Brave New World. Consider how he uses a variety of characters to show the ranges of social conformity.
Analyse the linguistic and structural methods by which Huxley conveys the beliefs, practises and social issues raised in Chapter Three of Brave New World. Consider how he uses a variety of characters to show the ranges of social conformity. Linguistically, Huxley cleverly incorporates different techniques into his writing to successfully portray both the structured views of the society in Brave New World and also, the necessity to conform to this society. One technique Huxley uses to convey beliefs clearly, and the idea of conformity is repetition. In pages thirty-eight to forty-six, a conversation takes place between Fanny and Lenina with voices in the background as a voice of the conformed society. 'Ending is better than mending, ending is better than mending.' These hypnopaedic voices clearly show how Lenina feels drawn to thinking and what their society regards as correct. Fanny is also used as a voice for society in hers and Lenina's conversation, when Lenina begins to think individually and differently to her own views. This conversation, however, appears strange to us as readers as the beliefs of the people in Brave New World are the opposite of our own expected reactions. Characters such as Lenina make how similar most other characters are increasingly obvious. Idyllic language is also used when describing unpleasant subjects, which both shocks the reader and show
Hallows Marsh
Hallows Marsh As the fog swept in from the sea to cover the marshland, and the sea gulls went back to their nests for the night, an eerie screech echoed through the air, but not the thickening fog. All was dark, and then the solemn silence that had always been there came back, as if the screech had been lost in eternal darkness. Then, suddenly, there was another screech. A young boy, the age of no more than seven was stuck in a marsh bog. He was slowly drowning and there was no one to help him. However much he howled or yelled his screams never pierced the ever-hardening mist. Then, the silence came back and this time it would last. There would be no more screams until twenty years later. John and Jake were best friends they would always do absolutely everything together, no matter what it was or when it was, they stuck together like glue. They had done lots of daring and naughty things in their lives, but nothing could possibly match what they were planning to do tonight. They were going to go to the scariest place in the whole of England. (At least in their eyes it was.) And they were planning to go by themselves. Everything that they had planned was perfect. They were going to go down to Hallows Marsh and look around. Their friends had told them the story of what happened to a boy down there about twenty years ago but they took no notice. That night, when
1984 vs. Brave New World
A Comparison Contrast of A Brave New World and 1984 Although many similarities exist between Aldous Huxley's A Brave New World and George Orwell's 1984, the works books though they deal with similar topics, are more dissimilar than alike. A Brave New World is a novel about the struggle of Bernard Marx, who rejects the tenants of his society when he discovers that he is not truly happy. 1984 is the story of Winston who finds forbidden love within the hypocrisy of his society. In both cases, the main character is in quiet rebellion against his government which is eventually found to be in vain. Huxley wrote A Brave New World in the third person so that the reader could be allotted a more comprehensive view of the activities he presents. His characters are shallow and cartoon-like (Astrachan) in order to better reflect the society in which they are entrapped. In this society traditional notions of love and what ideally should come out of it have long been disregarded and are now despised, "Mother, monogamy, romance. High spurts the fountain; fierce and foamy the wild jet. The urge has but a single outlet." (Huxley 41) The comparison to a wild jet is intended to demonstrate the inherent dangers in these activities. Many of the Brave New World's social norms are intended to 'save' its citizens from anything unpleasant through depriving them of the opportunity to miss anything
BRAVE NEW WORLD
BRAVE NEW WORLD - By Aldous Huxley PLOT The novel opens in the Central London Hatchery and Conditioning Centre, in the years A.F., or After Ford. Ford is the God-surrogate, a corruption of the name Freud, the controversial psychosexual psychologist. The Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning is leading a tour group of young students around a lab. He explains the scientific process by which human beings are fertilized and custom-made, and shows them the Social Predestination room, where workers create the social castes. They pass onto the conditioning rooms, where they reinforce the caste divisions by sleep-teaching. Lenina confirms with Bernard that she would like to go on a trip with him to The Savage Reservation. Following her departure, there is more bitterness on the part of Bernard concerning his own inferiority. Lenina and Henry eat dinner, go on a soma-holiday, and see a concert of synthetic music. Later, they have sex. The next day is Bernard Marx's Solidarity Service Day. A group of men and women sing and take soma together, and it eventually turns into an "orgy-porgy". Lenina and Bernard go on a date. He tries to show her the ocean, and to express some of his subversive views to her, but she cries. She convinces him to take soma, and they go back to his rooms and have sex. The next day, when Lenina asks him if he had fun, Bernard is pained at the way she
Brave New World - summary.
Brave New World Essay It seems clear that most people in the World State are happy and contented. There are no longer problems such as disease, war, poverty, or unemployment in this society. Why then, do Bernard Helmholtz and John criticise the quality of their lives? What is wrong with World State Society? 600 hundred years into the future has advanced the new World State technologically, and perhaps also in the way of life for its citizens. Some might even go so far as to say it is an improvement. At least, in the physical aspects of their lifestyle. Happiness and contentment seemingly prevail. What price though, has had to be paid for that happiness and contentment? Nothing comes for free after all. The question is - was that price too high? Bernard Marx - an Alpha plus male, is ostracised because of his inferior looks and his thoughts and ideas about the promiscuous sexual practices considered not only healthy but also mandatory. He does not belong. One does not find fault with one's world unless one's world finds fault with one. Bernard had reason to find fault with the World State because he was ostracised, and therefore, unhappy. When he later had fame and popularity because of John, he forgot all that he had previously found so inadequate about his life. "Success went fizzily to Bernard's head, and in the process completely reconciled him (as any good