"Examine How Two Different Authors have used the Detective Story Genre in Different Ways and to different effects"

Authors Avatar

 “Examine How Two Different Authors have used the Detective Story Genre in Different Ways and to different effects”                          

“The Speckled Band” is a short story written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle published in 1892. “Lamb to the Slaughter” is another short story, written by Roald Dahl in the mid-20th Century. These two stories are both examples of the “Detective story Genre” but they are different in many respects as well as similar to establish differences in literary effect. I will compare these two stories to show the range of storytelling in this genre.

          In “The Speckled Band”, the crime committed is a murder; the crime committed in “Lamb to the Slaughter” is also a murder. The weapon used to carry out the crime was a snake, this is shown when Sherlock Holmes on finding the weapon says, “A swamp adder…the deadliest snake in India”. The weapon in Dahl’s story is a frozen leg of lamb, “…she swung the big frozen leg of lamb high in the air and brought it down on his head”. It would appear in Doyle’s piece that the murder seems much more exotic whereas in Dahl’s story is a lot more simple. I think this is so because during the time Doyle wrote the piece, Britain, the country of origin possessed a large empire. Of which contained India, and so to show off Britain’s supremacy and exploit the “Jewel in the Crown” as it was referred to, it was put in literature to make more fantastical.

          The crime in “The Speckled Band” uses a secret passage, a ventilator to be exact. So it uses a form of puzzle, this is to intrigue the reader and make them think and solve. However, in the “Lamb to the Slaughter”, the criminal act is again simple and not complicated, it’s more rational.

           Suspects in Doyle’s story are Dr Grimesby Roylott, this can be found when it is said, “…of immense strength, and absolutely uncontrollable in his anger” this describes Roylott as a suspect because he seems already sinister. Someone with a bad temper who can lash out seems suspicious because he could cause harm or damage and possibly a murder in a moment of uncontrollable anger. Also gypsies are suspected, “…the presence of a band of gipsies who are on intimate terms with this old doctor”. The gypsies are thrown in the story to make the reader already think they are the criminals and take them away from the real clues. But because there are more than one suspect, it draws the reader in the work out who committed the crime and be Sherlock Holmes - the detective.

          In “Lamb to the Slaughter” the only suspect is Mary Maloney, “She told him and he turned and whispered something to the other detective who immediately went outside into the street”. This is when Mary Maloney told the chief detective her alibi and it is checked out, she must be suspected if her alibi needs to be checked out. To see that she didn’t commit the crime and is not suspected she has to have an account of being somewhere else. An implied suspect is created by Jack Noonan, the chief detective, “Find the weapon, you’ve found the man”.

Join now!

          The motive for the crime in “Lamb to the Slaughter” is that Mary Maloney was told something by her husband that she didn’t like, what is told is never found out. But whatever is said shook Mary up enough to kill her husband. The motive for the villain Dr Grimesby Roylott was money. He murdered his stepdaughter so he didn’t have to pay her more money when she married, this was declared in her mother’s will. It is said, “Each daughter can claim an income of £250 in case of marriage… a marriage would cripple ...

This is a preview of the whole essay