Examine how Willy Russell presents the nature/nurture debate in Blood Brothers.

Authors Avatar

Natalie Baker

Examine how Willy Russell presents

 the nature/nurture debate in Blood Brothers.

 Where you live determines your future. This was very true during the time in which Willy Russell’s Blood Brothers was set. It was all about the amount of money you had, what job you had and who your relatives were. It was all about how you spoke, the clothes that you wore and the school that you went too. It was all about class, but did any of this determine the kind of person you were. Are you born an intelligent, nicer individual just because you are born into upper class, or are you born a thief just because you are born into middle class? It was the nature vs. nurture debate, which Willy Russell used to ask the question, does class determine your future? In Mickey and Eddies case it did, although they started off as two very similar boys who enjoyed playing games and running about, it was inevitable for the two boys to lead two very different adult hoods.

  For Mickey, he thought that he would never be anything more than a factory worker and that because of where he came from, meant that he couldn’t possibly do any better. It’s the same for Eddie, except he knew that he could be whatever he wanted to be because of the money he had and the school that he went to. Willy Russell based a lot of his story around the effects that Margaret Thatcher caused. She made the gap between middle class and upper class people wider than ever, making where you lived and how much money you earned more important than the person you were. Middle class people were put into council houses that were tiny, cramped and cold, but although this was the case, there was a strong sense of community between the neighbours and all of the children played together in a care free environment, unlike upper class houses that were widely separated and had their own gardens for the children to play in.

  This made Mickey and Eddie even more different because of the nurture side to the debate. Eddie had been raised alone and was smothered by his parents compassion and love and was given his parents full attention. Mickey was raised by only his mother and had other siblings to take up her time. ‘With seven hungry mouths to feed and one more nearly due.’ His mother gave him much love, but Mickey only had his troublesome older brother to look up to as a role model where as Eddie had his sensible, hard working father to set an example for him. Simple things like having a strong male role model around for a young boy is seen as important, this is because young boys like Mickey and Eddie copy things that they see being done by those they look up to or are friends with. This maybe one of the reasons for Mrs.Lyons wanting Eddie not to mix with other children from the counsel estate and is the also the reason for Eddie swearing at his teacher and calling his mother a ‘fuckoff’ when he gets angry at her. ‘I know what you are. You’re a fuckoff! MRS LYONS: You learn filth from them and behave like a horrible little boy, like them.’ Mickey’s bad behaviour and foul mouth began to rub off on Eddie.  Mrs.Lyons, being the over protective mother she was, was also worried of losing her precious son. ‘Its just…its these people…these people that Edward has started mixing with. Can’t you see how he’s drawn to them? They’re drawing him away from me.’

Join now!

  The counsel estates were a hard place to grow up, Mickey growing up as he did meant that he had to go to a state school and had to adapt to the slang that was seen as ‘cool’ by his mates if he was to be accepted. Eddie on the other hand was expected to be polite to others and talk a certain way. If you didn’t have much money, which was the case for middle class citizens, you had to survive on the bear essentials. Mickey was always seen as a scruffy lad on stage that didn’t ...

This is a preview of the whole essay