Explain how Mark Antony was able to persuade the plebeians of Rome that the killing of Caesar was a diabolical act.

Authors Avatar

Katie Tinklin                

Explain how Mark Antony was able to persuade the plebeians of Rome that the killing of Caesar was a diabolical act.

 

   William Shakespeare wrote the political thriller Julius Caesar in 1599. Other famous speakers such as Winston Churchill, Martin Luther King and Hitler have copied the technique Mark Antony and Brutus spoke to the plebeians in the play. The speeches were successful by using various types of persuasion for example patterns of three, repetition, rhetorical questions and irony. Brutus appealed to the heads of the plebeians while Antony spoke to their hearts and emotions.

        The speech of Brutus begins with a pattern of three. “Romans, Countrymen and lovers” which is a good persuasive introduction as it involves all plebeians. Brutus then explains why he killed Caesar and uses a rhetorical question “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves than that Caesar were dead and live all free men?” A rhetorical question does not need an answer, yet it makes the plebeians think that what Brutus did was for the good of Rome.

        Brutus then uses rhythmic patterning to describe achievements of Caesar and the consequences of these achievements, when he says “joy for his fortune, honour for his valour and death for his ambition”.

        To continue the speech he uses a number of rhetorical questions, one example is “Who is here is so base that would not be a bondman?” The reason why he does this is because he wants to involve the plebeians but he does not want an answer to his question; this is a good use of persuasion because it makes the plebeians think. Brutus then uses another persuasive technique; pauses. As the plebeians are fickle they are easily convinced and will share their opinions quickly “None Brutus none!” which shows the plebeians have already forgotten Caesar.

        After the reply from the plebeians Brutus pronounces, “I have done no more to Caesar than you shall do to Brutus.” This is a honourable remark from Brutus as he would rather be one of the plebeians than kill his way to be king. “Brutus had rather be a villager” this shows that he is honourable and what he tells the plebeians is the truth, which persuades the plebeians to be on his side.

        Mark Antony now enters the scene with the dead body of Caesar. This is where Brutus makes an enormous mistake by allowing Mark Antony to speak to the plebeians, even though he has been warned by Cassius, after the death of Caesar, “know you how much people maybe moved. By that which he will utter.” This shows that Cassius knew that they should have killed Mark Antony if the conspirators where to become dictators, however Brutus was far too honourable and overruled the thinking of Cassius.

        Towards the end of the Brutus’ speech he proclaims that “I have the same dagger for myself, when it shall please my country to need my death,” showing that he is noble and would not go against his country, Rome. Brutus now wants the plebeians to understand that he is allowing Mark Antony to speak as he feels it is to his advantage yet does not know he is making a huge mistake “By our permission is allowed to make,” showing the audience who is in charge.

Join now!

        The speech of Mark Antony begins with him addressing the plebeians with a pattern of three; “Friends, Romans, and Countrymen,” this is a good introduction as it involves the plebeians. The introduction in similar to the speech of Brutus because it uses a pattern of three, yet Antony announces the plebeians as ‘Friends’ whereas Brutus does not. The speech is performed as poetry using blank versed Iambic Pentameter, which is powerful and appeals to the hearts of the plebeians and is a skilful use of persuasion, “The evil that men do live after them. The good is oft interred in ...

This is a preview of the whole essay