Form and structure of Absurd Person Singular

Authors Avatar

Form and structure of Absurd Person Singular

Plays are usually divided into acts and scenes. However in Absurd Person Singular we can clearly see three acts although there is evidently one scene in each act which in itself is a continuous sequence of events. Playwrights often have parallel scenes at different points in a play, or juxtapose two very different scenes to make a point. However Alan Ayckbourn juxtaposes the acts by having each act as the consecutive year therefore highlighting the change that we see. I find that Alan Ayckbourn has two or three plot lines going at once, and he uses the sub-plots to illuminate the main plot. The play is a farce with comical acts however he maintains to incorporate the serious undertones.

The structure of the play is distinctively unique; it is not a one way play as each act is a story in its own right linked by past, present and future. The play also doesn’t have a conclusion which illustrates Ayckbourns suggestion that comedy doesn’t need a happy ending, just like real life doesn’t.

        The form and structure of the play is the way in which Ayckbourn has decided to put across his intentions to the audience. Everything he does in the play has an intended reason and is for a specific meaning. Form and structure and normally generalized depending on the certain genre however I find Absurd Person Singular individual in its own right. Within the structure of the play, Ayckbourn uses different forms to convey meaning. For instance by having one scene in each act allows the play to flow keeping a fast pace and sustains our attention.

             The play runs through time in chronological order, last Christmas, this Christmas and next Christmas, and they are each set in each of the couple’s homes yet all the acts are set in the kitchens of the couples.  The kitchen is a key aspect of the play and has imperative meaning. Most people would assume to see the action take place in the dining room as they eat however we observe all the scenes in 3 different kitchens. I think that he choose to use kitchens because he wanted us to see the characters completely true, meaning without the usual reserved conversation and polite activities that we relate to the formal sitting rooms. Kitchens are seen as more informal so therefore an appropriate setting to reveal the true natures of personalities and relationships, thus also avoiding the monotonous small talk.  An upstairs bedroom and gardens just outside the kitchen doors are also used by the playwright for supplementary offstage action. There are two major areas in the play where offstage action occurs which is sitting rooms of the Hopcrofts and the Jackson’s. There the customs of well-mannered conversation are played out; however, we see onstage, in the kitchens, where much more of household life is essentially lived, this is where the social fences fall.

Join now!

All the acts start off with the couple hosting the Christmas party on their own in the kitchen of their house, apart from Act 3. Act 3 has a different structure to the other acts and I think there is a crucial meaning behind this. Eva is alone in the kitchen of the Brewster-Wrights with Ronald while Marion is in bed. This indicates the breakdown of the strong relationship that was seen before and although they are still living together, it is revealed that they don’t even see each other. After seeing two acts similarly with a couple in the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay