Frankenstein: Look at the significance of Chapter 5 to the novel as a whole.

Authors Avatar

Riyadh Abdulla 11J4        English Literature: Pre-1914 Prose        Instructor: Mrs Patel

Mary Shelley (1797-1851) has incorporated different techniques in her novel Frankenstein, especially in Chapter 5, to achieve different atmospheres in order to provide a clear sense of character which helps readers to shape their personal interpretations of what is happening and why it is happening by ambiguous use of language.

Frankenstein, also known as ‘The Modern Prometheus’, was written during the early 19th century (1816-1817), when Shelley was at the young age of 18.

Shelley was surrounded by death, this can insight the reader as to where her eccentric ideas and fascinations of creating life, which condemned societal thoughts and morality at that period, had arisen from.

Frankenstein is written in two contrasting genres; Gothic and Romance. Shelley fuses these two genres together to create a dramatic effect which will linger until the final pages where the tragedy, and fatality of this mix, is uncovered.

Themes which Chapter 5 explores and shapes for the novel as a whole are: Loneliness and solitude; obsessive science; prejudice via superficiality; fate (of different characters); morality: the effects of arrogance and self-righteousness; and the effects of psychological mentality on one’s actions.

Victor’s creation feels loneliness; he yearns for a resemblance or someone that would at minimum look past his appearance. On the other hand Victor voluntarily isolates himself, taking others’ concerns for granted.

 

Family concerns for Victor’s welfare is emphasised by the constant letters to and from Elizabeth for him; one of which clearly demonstrates this is at the beginning of Chapter 6.

It was socially inadequate of one, especially Victor who is close to Elizabeth, to not keep in contact for such a prolonged period. This emphasises how obsessive he was to complete his experiment; even if it did take an extensive period of time, and would create greater concern. He had a priority, which if a scientist has, must first be completed, “I had worked hard for nearly two years.” ‘Two years’ emphasises this long period. This was significant at that time, the 19th century, since the family class-system was dominant. Thus extended families, including aunts and uncles, were very common; hence this reinforces the amount of concern which Victor, due to his obsessive attitude of completing his goal, had been oblivious of.

His obliviousness is further emphasised when Henry Clerval, his friend who arrived at Ingolstadt to study Science, tells him that his family wants to receive a letter back in his own hand-writing, rather than being written from Henry by his dictations. Victor, in spite of getting them to such distaste answers: “dear, dear friends whom I love, and who are so deserving of my love.” This emphasises how he did not think about their feelings in such an initially obsessive, and now fugitive, state.

Victor is so indulged in his misery that when Henry asks to speak to him about “one subject”, he turns pessimistic, assuming the worst: “Could he allude to an object on whom I dared not even think of.” ‘I dared not even think of’ is a paradoxical method of making himself forget about his creation as he is trying not to name him. It roots itself deep inside his brain as it is the first thought that conjures.

 His fugitive state is emphasised as he tries to, in which ever way or method, to hide from the ‘wretch’ of whom he created, “I took refuge in the courtyard.” The way Victor describes the close endeavour from his house as a ‘refuge’ is dramatic as it shows his displacement from the things which he owns by his own creation which has just been endowed with life - his creature is overtaking him both mentally and physically. This is the beginning of his life under the patrol of his creation. If Victor had chosen to share his knowledge with other willing men of Science, beyond his state of delirium, with, say, Henry; he may have had the opportunity, or cooperative help, to put the creature’s activities to a halt – or to merely ‘prevent’ the deaths of those whom he ‘loves’.

 Reference to the ‘courtyard’ further this dramatic, reinforcing his distilled thoughts as a courtyard is an open-space surrounded by only four walls on each side; this is just enough space for Victor to ponder through and device his thoughts on how to banish the monster, but, however, is not enough space to view the full-picture of the what the monster is really trying to achieve. Victor is thus prone to over-analysis due to his scientific mind.

This over-analysis is evident in ‘deciding’ the fate of Elizabeth. Victor misinterprets the creature’s warning of “I will be there on your wedding night;” he thinks – despite seeing the countless number of his relations murdered – that the creature is referring to him; he is planning to kill him, and not Elizabeth: “On that night he had determined to consummate his crimes by my death”.

Join now!

In a sense, Victor is naive enough to still think that the creature wants to physically demolish him – which is emphasised by his voluntary endeavour to hunt the creature down to the North Pole. Victor perceives this as avenging himself and all that had been killed; but in the eyes of the creature this is a game of his manipulation taking its effect.

In Chapter 5 Victor is dubious about what he sees, “I thought I saw the dreaded spectre glide into the room.” ‘Thought’ emphasises his uncertainty, which grows into a more profound level as the novel ...

This is a preview of the whole essay