From the way Priestly presents the characters, who do you think is most to blame for the death of Eva Smith/Daisy Renton?

Authors Avatar

Abigail Kaye

From the way Priestly presents the characters, who do you think is most to blame for the death of Eva Smith/Daisy Renton?

Inspector Calls is set in the fictitious North Midlands industrial city of Brumley during the Edwardian Era in 1912. Arthur Birling and his wife, Sybil, are holding a dinner party to celebrate their daughter’s engagement. Among the guests is Gerald Croft, the daughter’s fiancé. Gerald is the son of a business rival, Sir George Croft, and Mr. Birling is extremely pleased with the match partly due to the closer business links he hopes to develop with Gerald’s father.  The play centres on the arrival of a Police Inspector, who says he is investigating the suicide of a young working class woman. As the play progresses, we learn how each member of the family was involved with the woman, and how they all contributed to her apparent suicide.

The Edwardian Era was a period of huge social divisions and distinctions. Characters such as Mr and Mrs Birling were very common. While they lived in luxury, over eight million people had to live on less that 25 shillings a week and as a result were in poverty. The working classes had virtually no rights and were separated into the “deserving” and “un-deserving” classes. J.B. Priestly was writing in 1946 at a time of great optimism, following the downfall of the Nazi Regime, and was trying to convey a message of responsibility throughout the play. Responsibility is one of the main themes of the play and J.B. Priestly was very politically minded. He was appalled and disgusted by the way the rich didn’t seem to have any empathy for the poor in pre 1914 Britain. I think the play is inspired by the social situation of 1912 and is almost a historian’s view of the Edwardian Era. J.B Priestly was a political and social thinker and this shows in a lot of the 40 plays he wrote. He favoured the themes of fate, responsibility and personal choice in a lot of his plays but also used themes such as lies and love. He was a patriotic socialist but also was passionately convinced of the need of social change to benefit the poor. To this end he wrote An Inspector Calls which he saw as a contribution to public understanding of social responsibility.

The first character that the Inspector tackles is Mr. Birling. He is a successful factory-owner, a local magistrate and Ex-Lord Mayor of Brumley. He is rather provincial in his speech but tries to appear more upper class. He regards himself as a reasonable man but has little or no imagination. He seems blind both to the consequences of his and others actions. He makes predictions about the future - the unsinkability of the Titanic, “the titanic-she sails next week…unsinkable…” the impossibility of Germany declaring war. This is ironic because the audience knows that Germany declared war, and that the Titanic sunk that very same year in 1912.  Money or profit only motivates him; for instance he cannot understand why nations should go to war and upset the businessman’s quest for profit. It does not occur to him that people might value other things more highly, such as love, and this plays an important part in his downfall later on in the play. I think J.B Priestly has made him out to be a true caricature of a capitalistic businessman. Along with money and profit, Birling is a man obsessed with status. He and his wife both take great pains to mention their high status at every opportunity to every fellow man. For instance when being questioned by the Inspector, he tries to warn the Inspector that the Chief Constable is “an old friend” and that they are still close.

 His part in the events leading up to Eva’s death, was that sacked her after she campaigned for a pay rise and had gone on strike because of the conditions in which she and her fellow employees worked. He refused to give her the extra money she asked for because it was his “duty to keep labour costs down” and so he told them to find work elsewhere. Birling is very stubborn in his views. He thinks he is always right and doesn’t really listen to people unless they are agreeing with him. I think Priestly wrote him to represent the rich social climbers of the early 1900’s. He is arrogant but at the same time almost amusing because of some of the comments he makes, for instance when he says “the Titanic - she sails next week-…and unsinkable, absolutely unsinkable”. This is ironic because the audiences know that the Titanic sunk that year, and so we see that he is just “all-mouth”. He is also obsessed with status. He judges anyone on what status he or she has in society, as shown when he mentions to Gerald that he may be getting a Knighthood. He is falsely modest, saying, “there’s a fair chance that I might find my way into the next Honours List. Just a knighthood, of course.” He is trying to appear well bred and make people admire him but the audiences just find him trivial.

 When the Inspector interrogates him, his response just shows how pompous he really is. He feels insulted because he feels it has nothing to do with him, “obviously it has nothing whatever to do with that wretched girl’s suicide”. He absolves all responsibilities saying, “I can’t accept responsibility. If we were all responsible for everything that happened to everybody we’d had anything to do with, it would be very awkward, wouldn’t it”. He shows that he doesn’t particularly care about the girl when he refers to her as “that wretched girl”. He shows no responsibility whatsoever for the girl saying, “obviously it hasn’t nothing to do with the…suicide”.  Mr. Birling sees himself as an upholder of all the “right” values. But throughout the play he is exposed as self-centred and essentially heartless. He begins by trying to put the Inspector in his place, through emphasizing his own place in society. He tries to hide or dismiss uncomfortable truths but as Eric points out, is totally useless in a real crisis. Eric disagrees with Mr. Birling, saying “as you were saying, Dad, a man has to look after himself.” Here Eric is plainly “taking the mickey” out of Mr. Birling’s ideals and is disgusted with him. Sheila also doesn’t agree with Mr. Birling as she thinks, “it was a mean thing to do”. The two offspring are the only two of the household to resent their father and even Gerald agrees with Mr. Birling saying, “we’d have done the same in your position”.

Join now!

At the end of the play, it is plain that Birling’s motives are not to save Eric from being found out, but to protect himself from a “social scandal”. To do this he will go to all lengths to distort or totally disregard the truth. H e is blind to this hypocrisy, and indifferent when it is pointed out. Just before the end of the play he happily argues that “the whole thing’s different now”, and ridicules his family for being taken in by the Inspector. He proves that he is shallow and that what he really values most is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay