How are people presented in "Two scavengers" and "What were they like?".

     The language in two scavengers is very vivid and descriptive, the appearances of the people tell us a lot about them, The ‘cool couple’ are dressed well with the man in a ‘hip three-piece linen suit’ and the woman with ‘a short skirt and colored stockings’ with her blond hair ‘casually coiffed’ this presents them as stylish and modern, whereas the garbage men are ‘grungy’ and obviously from a poor background. However the poet uses a lot of colour to describe the garbage men in their ‘bright yellow garbage truck’ and ‘red plastic blazers’, this contrasts with the rich couple where no colours are specified. This suggests that the garbage men have a more interesting ‘colourful’ life style than the rich couple. In ‘what were they like’ the language is formal and I my opinion it is more poetic than two scavengers which is more modern. In the second stanza instead of using colours to create a image the poet uses unpleasant words such as ‘killed’, ‘burned’, ‘bones’, ‘charred’, ‘smashed’ and ‘screamed’ to give a vivid image of war and destruction. The first stanza of what were they like is set in the past tense - it is asking what there were like rather than what they are this is almost telling us that they are no longer like this even before we have heard the real answers.  Two scavengers is written in present tense which gives it urgency that this divide in society is happening now. The poem is constantly comparing the two sets of people, and in one part it shows us how they are actually very alike- the younger of the garbage men ‘also has sunglasses and long hair’ and is about age same age as the Mercedes driver. This similarity forces us to compare them more and makes us realize that it is only class dividing them. One thing that is very ironic in two scavengers is that the garbage men are looking down on the couple in the Mercedes ‘both scavengers gazing down’ this is almost a switch in role as it should be the other way round. ‘What were they like’ is not so much a comparison poem although some could say that it is comparing the Vietnamese people before and after the war. The reality is given to you as it is, this makes it powerful and shocking one example of this is ‘laughter is bitter to the burned mouth’

     The attitude of ‘two scavengers’ is hard to tell, it is not particularly emotional unlike ‘what were they like’. However it does have a strong political message. Even though America is supposed to be a democracy, the poet obviously doesn’t agree, he illustrates this in his poem. Even though the ‘scavengers’ are only a meter away from the ‘beautiful people’ they gaze down at them as if they are ‘a great distance’. The main meaning that the poet is trying to convey is that even though everyone is supposed to be equal they are not and probably never will be. The last line ‘across that small gulf in the high seas of this democracy’ is very powerful and is suggesting that the social indifference exists on a much wider scale.  ‘What were they like’ is an anti war poem and you can feel how strongly the poet feels about it, the last line is also very powerful ‘their singing resembled the flight of moths in moonlight. Who can say? It is silent now’ this sums up the whole poem and hits you very hard.  In ‘what were they like’ the Viennese people are presented as very innocent and peaceful people and almost like children ‘their life was in rice and bamboo’.

     Both poems are similar in the fact that they both have a unusual presentation, and that they are both making a strong political comment, however they are also very different in that two scavengers is about one small event and what were they like is about a very big event and a whole culture and group of people. My favorite poem of the two is ‘what were they like’, I think it is more poetic and powerful.