How believable did you find the transformation of Miss Ruddock in Prison?

Authors Avatar

How believable did you find the transformation of Miss Ruddock in Prison?

Irene Ruddock, the main character in Alan Bennett’s dramatic monologue, “Lady of Letters” first gives the impression of being a prejudiced, nosey and naïve woman who writes letters whenever she finds something of which she disapproves. However, after entering prison for libel she encounters a huge personality change.  In my opinion, the time scale in which this happens is the biggest factor which makes it unbelievable. I am going to discuss other factors that contribute for and against this decision.

To begin with, Miss Ruddock starts the monologue in a negative way “I can’t say the service was up to scratch”. From even the very first sentence she starts speaking, the audience, ironically, are supposed to make prejudicial assumptions about her. Throughout the first scenes we see, she makes horribly racist and prejudicial judgements on people she deems as inferior like “they don’t look very promising… the kiddy looks filthy”. Making decisions when she doesn’t fully know the situation promotes the idea of her being nosey and extremely quick to jump to conclusions.

We also see a lonely side to Miss Ruddock since she goes to a funeral of a distant acquaintance for an excuse to go out. Although she reveals that she hasn’t been out in a long time, “At least it’s an outing”, she tries to deny this by putting on a brave front “which is the one time I’m dangling my feet”. The truth is that she is always dangling her feet. However she is ashamed to admit this since her mother was always very sociable “My mother knew everybody in this street.” She seems to feel overshadowed by her mother.

Furthermore, the reader sees her as a petty person for writing a poison pen letter to the director of operations from the crematorium because the hearse drivers had been smoking in the rhododendrons near the crematorium, “The least I could do was to write”. Additionally, the reader sees just how naïve and gullible she is because she misunderstands the reply that is basically telling her politely that they would not take any action, “I had a charming letter back.” She also thinks it is necessary to write to the relatives of the lady who had died to inform them what she had done. She could not see that the relatives did not really care and had more distressing things on their mind. This adds to the audience’s view of her being naïve.

Join now!

 To confirm this point, when the opticians write to her to remind her that she should buy more glasses as they will ”certainly be in need of verification” she misinterprets this as a nice gesture and writes back to thank them, “I said I thought it was considerate of them to have kept me in mind”. This was unnecessary as they were only trying to create business by getting her to pay for more glasses. At this point, it becomes quite clear that through isolation, she has suffered a loss of perspective.

When Miss Ruddock describes the pen that her ...

This is a preview of the whole essay