How do symbols organise and define to construct kinship? A comparison from the ethnography of Ndembu and American (USA) cultures.

Authors Avatar

Q2. How do symbols organise and define to construct kinship? A comparison from the ethnography of Ndembu and American (USA) cultures.

Introduction

Kinship is a social and cultural construction and to be found within kinship is the family unit. This essay shall investigate Kinship in a western and Ndembu cultural context to investigate symbolism and how it organises and defines to construct kinship. Specifically, love, marriage and social context will be examined to illustrate this construction.

Symbolism

Before delving straight into the ethnography of the Ndembu and the United States of America (from here on in known as America) the definition of symbolism has to be understood. Firstly, symbols, as understood outside of the social and psychological realms, is, “something which stands for something else, or some things else, where there are no necessary or intrinsic relationship between the symbol and that which it symbolises” (Schneider 1968:1). There is a distinct relationship between symbols and culture. Symbols are culturally constructed, as culture is a system of symbolic meanings. A symbol may bear no relationship to the action or object being symbolised but is rather given meaning by the people in that cultural environment.

An example of symbolism can be found in language. Each word that we make has a symbolic meaning, yet it does not bear any intrinsic relation to the object, idea or action. Saussure (1959:65-70) uses the terms signifier and signified to describe an arbitrary nature of the sign. The signified is the concept and the signifier is the sound image (word). The word “tree” as a signifier bears little intrinsic relation to the actual tree as the signified constituent. The meaning is only clear in the cultural and psychological context in which it is to be interpreted correctly by the person in receipt of the sign. The Latin word for tree is “Arbour” and if the reader did not know this then the signifier would have little meaning as it has no associative bond to the signified. It can be deduced that in language the relationship between the concept and the sound image is arbitrary then it is not a natural relationship we are born with. Furthermore, if words are not natural then the relationship must then be cultural, psychological and social in there construction. Then if a person does not understand the signifier that is symbolised in that language then the person will just hear a sound with no associative bond.

Join now!

Symbols regulate people within a culture, informing each person what is and is not acceptable within culture. The symbol directs the person to the correct and normal procedure, as culture is the result of the symbols being adhered to. Schneider qualifies this by saying, “Among the different forms in which symbols can be cast, one consists of the definition and differentiation of persons in interaction. This is the set of rules which specify who should do what under what circumstances” (1968: 5). It is through symbols that we understand the construction of kinship. Within kinship there are sets of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay