'In his Talking Heads plays Alan Bennett presents vivid portraits of human frailty and challenges us to respond to them'. Discuss this statement with references to

Authors Avatar

Daniel Dowd 11J                                               15th September 2002

‘In his Talking Heads plays Alan Bennett presents vivid portraits of human frailty and challenges us to respond to them’.  Discuss this statement with references to  “A Chip in the Sugar” and “Bed amongst the Lentils”

In the play a Chip in the Sugar Alan Bennett shows us a life of a very unconfident man who still lives with his mum.  Alan Bennett has put the play to us in the way he has so that we listen to the feelings there aren’t any special effects unlike most modern films. We pick up on every little minor feeling or expression.  There are special techniques used in the play though.  In the play they use different camera shots but they sustain the same shot for a substantial amount of time.  Different angles in the shots help gain effects on facial expressions.  Which is an important part of this play.  They used medium shots, which include most of the scene, and also long shots, which give a distanced view, but they are not used very often because all the focus is on Grahams face, but the camera technique that gained the best effect was close up.  This shot focuses on something in detail and this was used a lot when Graham was talking.  They did this because in the play facial expressions and feelings were very important and they wanted to get the impression of Graham across very early.  They wanted you to see that he was very quite, and not very confident.  They also fade out at the end of the scene a lot to change scenes.  In the play music is used to enhance the mood or reflect the images being shown.  In the play they use techniques and that is why they gain viewers but they don’t do it with money and special effects, and this is why the play is so effective and makes viewers get so interested.  Emotive language is used and this appeals to our emotions and aims to make the viewer react in a certain way.  It brings a response from us, which is the purpose of the story.  It will make you either sympathise with graham or it will make you feel that he is interfering in his mums business too much because of his paranoia and mental problems.

Graham gets used to things and likes tradition.  But when Frank Turnbull comes along he becomes very jealous because his mum is laughing with Frank.  Frank asks Mrs Whittaker if she would like to go to a different restaurant for tea and Graham goes on about how they always go to a certain restaurant but she agrees with out a second thought.  Mrs Whittaker asks for the cheeseburger even though last time when she had a pizza she had an upset stomach after it and Graham was sat up with her all night holding a bucket until she was better.  When a comment is said about Graham he backs off and avoids confrontation.  “ I don’t believe in mental illness.  Nine times out of ten it’s a case of pulling your socks up,” Frank says.  But then Graham tells us “I didn’t say anything”.  Graham isn’t assertive even though he has had mental problems.  Another thing that Frank says is “You don’t always want to be with your mother at your age, do you Graham” and he replies “I didn’t say anything,” He is a very frail and quiet man who feels most comfortable with his mum.

Join now!

Graham becomes very embarrassed when his mother makes an outburst about his magazines.  She said, “I know the kind of magazines you read.”

I said “Chess.  You’ll catch cold.”  She said, “They never are chess. Chess with no clothes on. Chess in their birthday suits. That kind of chess.  Chess men.”  I said, “Go to bed and turn your blanket off.”  Graham doesn’t deny the allegations made by his mother so this makes the reader think that Graham is a homosexual.  This does make us think about Graham in a different way.  Because we thought that he was just a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay