Is "An Inspector Calls" merely a prolonged clatter of skeletons?

Authors Avatar

Is “An Inspector Calls” merely a prolonged clatter of skeletons?

By the phrase “A prolonged clatter of skeletons” we mean a long drawn out revelation of many secrets. To some extents this is true of “An Inspector Calls”, but to say that this is the limit of the play’s message would be unfair to the hidden depths contained within. “An Inspector Calls" is a well-structured and well-made play because it contains many factors that captivate and sustain the attention of the audience. One of the factors that makes the play captivating is the use of climax, the way it holds the audience all the way through, building up slowly, gathering the plot as it goes on and then finally ends in a stunning climax, for example the way the Inspector extracts small threads of information from the members of the family and slowly puts the picture together and narrows it down to the main culprit as the climax.


John Boynton Priestley wrote “An Inspector Calls” in 1945 shortly after the end of the Second World War, when society was still experiencing the hardships of war. Despite a severe damage to the economic situation of Britain after the war, when paper and other such resources were in short supply, the publisher thought it important to print this play. In a time of poverty and shortcoming, “An Inspector Calls” delivers an important message to society. It is a message of mutual responsibility and shows how everyone has a role to play in society, and that we should do as much as we can to help others, because we never know what effect our actions will have on their lives. Priestley hoped his play would help create the desired effect of proactive unity, making people act to prevent something happening before it happens, amongst the public, giving society the chance with hindsight, to look back on what had transpired and learn from this.

Join now!


Priestley seems to be concerned with the darker side of Capitalism. "An Inspector Calls" is Priestley's call for reformation. Priestley sees the nation as a society with communal, rather than individual responsibilities. The members of the Birling family are only concerned with individual gain and profit over person. They are responsible for the young woman's death by treating her as property, and it is this lust for material wealth that Priestley speaks out against.

This Socialist message is delivered through the mouth of the Inspector, who takes on the role of a teacher to the Birling family. He hopes ...

This is a preview of the whole essay