King Lear - Lear Exclaims in Act 3 That He is "More Sinned Against Than Sinner". Do You Agree With This Assessment Of Himself?

Authors Avatar

Beverley Fielden

Access Literary Studies

Lear Exclaims in Act 3 That He is “More Sinned Against Than Sinner”. Do You Agree With This Assessment Of Himself?

Justice and judgment are key themes in King Lear. The first act shows how Lear treats his beloved Cordelia and his faithful servant Kent with unjustifiable banishment. As the play continues we become aware that Lear becomes a victim of injustice at the hands of Goneril and Regan. To explore Lear’s statement that he is “more sinned against than sinner” we need to examine some key moments in the play and examine if Lear is an offender or victim of injustice and whether in his madness he has redeemed himself.

The first words we hear Lear speak reflect his presence and powerful personality. This is a king that commands respect and expects all to jump at his command. He barks his abrupt order at Gloucester “Attend the lords of France and Burgundy” (1/1/29)

As we read further into Act 1 Scene 1 we learn he is a demanding father and commands love from his daughters the same way he commands his subjects. When his beloved Cordelia refuses to bestow on him an extravagant declaration of love he flies into a terrible rage and disclaims “All paternal care” (1/1/107) When his loyal servant Kent attempts to intervene on Cordelia’s behalf he too is banished. Lear is not used to being contradicted and on his own admittance he tells Kent to “come not between the dragon and his wrath” (1/1/116). The result of this “dragons wrath” is Lear’s immense misjudgement. He divides his kingdom between the insincere and evil daughters Goneril and Ragan. Lear has committed his first of the deadly sins, that of wrath. The image of the dragon breathing fire and brimstone is the traditional image of wrath. Shakespeare has used this image as a metaphor for King Lear’s rage.

Lear is blinded to the truth by flattery in the absurd “love trail” He has no concept of the true nature of parental love. He is guilty of spurning the true love of Cordelia, in favour of anger. The anger has clouded his good judgement.

As the action moves to Goneril’s house were we learn that Lear has assaulted Oswald in another one of his rages again committing the sin of wrath. Furthermore, he is so sure of his divine right as king that he will not listen to criticism. The fool repeatedly warns Lear of his folly over the banishment of Cordelia and the divisions of his land. Lear dismisses his warnings and even threatens, “Take heed sirrah the whip” Lear’s inability to recognise his moral mistakes and the excessive belief in his own sound judgement means he has committed his second deadly sin: the sin of pride and vanity. Just as his demanding declaration for love in the absurd “love trail” is rooted in his excessive pride and vanity.

Join now!

Meanwhile, Goneril hospitality towards her father is becoming strained. He is an expensive and demanding houseguest. He is abusing his rights as a guest. When he returns from hunting he imperiously demands his dinner. Service is not quick enough and Lear’s retinue are becoming unruly and disruptive. She begins to see an opportunity to be free of her father and his soldiers. She complains to Lear of the debauched soldiers behaviour and demands that he reduce his retinue.  This is a gross

Violation of the contract she made with him when he abdicated his throne and gave ...

This is a preview of the whole essay