Letter to an MP Concerning Vivisection

Authors Avatar

4 Eastlea

Clevedon

BS21 7YY

29 April 2002

Mark Francois MP

House of Commons                                                                               

London SW1 OAA

Dear Mr. Francois,

This letter, I have written to argue and put forward my views on vivisection that may be furthered in your discussions within the government.

From the moment we are born we are bombarded with chemicals that are potential hazards. Vaccines, food additives, household cleaners are but just a small fraction of chemicals we are exposed to in a lifetime. ‘Living simply’ may be a joke to some, but the results of chemical contamination is evident. Cancer, leukaemia, multiple sclerosis, sudden infant death syndrome, just to name a few, all have been linked to this contamination of our bodies. Our bodies are the receivers of everything in our world. What we eat, breath and drink all factor in with environmental and hereditary influences. How, then, can animal research benefit when we, as humans, differ from each other in such vast ways?

Join now!

There are drugs that have been ‘thoroughly tested’ on animals and found safe for them, yet have injured and killed people. There are also treatments that have helped humans that were delayed or almost overlooked because they didn't work on animals in the laboratory. Yet the scientific community, however, continues to assure us that vivisection is responsible for the medical treatments we use today and for the breakthroughs of tomorrow.

Many researchers contend that there are no alternatives for animals in research and testing. While this statement is mostly true, it implies that animal experiments are useful and therefore ...

This is a preview of the whole essay