Merchant of venice

Authors Avatar

Merchant of Venice

Is Shylock Introduced as a Sympathetic Character in Act 1 Scene 3?

On the surface Shylock seems to be the villain in the play. However Sylvan Barnet said “The Merchant of Venice shows the broad outline of a comedy” and he also said that “The villain in the comedy must be entirely villainous, or rather comically villainous, he cannot for one moment gain the audience sympathy”. Shylock is a likable character and a character the audience can sympathise with but sympathy or the lack of it largely rests in the hands of the audience.

This essay will consider whether or not the audience gains sympathy for Shylock in act 1 scene 3, bringing into consideration, historical context, differing audiences, the language used, and differing viewpoints.

It will refer to other points in the play as well as other Shakespearean plays as well as Shakespeare’s possible feelings and opinions which would have had implications on Shylock’s character and the characters in the play.

Society can have a large influence on how an audience receives a character.

Elizabethan society was one in which Anti-Semitism was a trend. It would have been near impossible for an audience to find an audience in support of Shylock because the history of Jews in England brought prejudice and discrimination against them.

England was a Christian country and Christians believed that Jews murdered Jesus. This was where the image of the murderous Jew came from and from 1290 the image became exaggerated and imprinted into Elizabethan society. Without real Jews around (as they were expelled from England in 1290) there was no one around to rid society of the absurd stereotype of the murderous Jew.

In 1594 the situation was worsened when a Jew as implicated in a plot to kill the queen. He was convicted and executed.

It is therefore safe to say that the image Shakespeare and the audience held of Jews was not a good one and Shylock would be a character no one would sympathise with because Shakespeare would have made sure he was completely villainous. However this may not be completely true.

Join now!

Traditionally Shakespearean villains had no defense, no motive and no personality. They are purely 2 dimensional characters for example Don John in Much Ado About Nothing he has no motives for ruining is friends wedding an in the end there is no sympathy for him as the audience does not get to know him. Yet Shylock has a personality, has motives and has a defense. The question is why does Shakespeare give him a defense.

It has been implied that Shakespeare knew the royal family well and used their staff. He may have used Lopez’ services and befriended him. He ...

This is a preview of the whole essay