Mr Birling Act 1

Authors Avatar

Arthur Birling

In “An Inspector Calls” by J.B Priestly, Arthur Birling, husband of Sybil Birling and father to Eric and Sheila Birling, is a successful business man. At around 50 years old, he represents the capitalist ruling class and the head of a patriarchal family structure that J.B Priestly is so critical of in the play.

At the very beginning of the play, in the stage directions, he is described as a, “heavy looking portentous man”. It’s almost as if Arthur is “heavily” set in his ways, that there will be no changing who he is and that his case is a hopeless one. He is said to be, “portentous”, showing his pompous nature and attitude of pride. This is shown when he refers to himself and Gerald as, “we hard-headed practical men of business”.

He is concerned with his social standing and is, as the modern audience would call him, a snob. He is convinced he is going to get a knighthood and doesn't want any scandal to get in the way of it, “'there's a fair chance I might find my way into the next Honours List.” This becomes more and more ironic as the play unfolds, as the audience begins to learn of the story that Mr Birling started.

Join now!

Birling sees himself as superior to many, especially the Inspector. “Well, if you don’t mind. I’ll find out first.” When the Inspector claims he will find out the reason why Sheila ran out of the room, Birling must take a higher stand. He sees himself as a higher authority, that he can find out before Inspector Goole.

Mr Birling refuses to accept any responsibility for the girl, Eva Smith, that he fired from a job, “I was quite justified in my decision”. J.B Priestly wanted to express how the modern society should learn to accept responsibility and look after one ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

This essay amounts to not much more than a set of notes - brief observations of Mr Birling are each supported by a suitable quotation and a short comment. There is little discernible structure and no development. There are also no overall conclusions drawn. As such, the observations are quite acute and the quotations used provide good support. The material could be used to provide the basis of a good essay. Paragraph structure has little logic but sentence construction is mostly well controlled and grammatical, using a good range of lexis. 3 stars