Pre 1900 poetry; Comparison of Ozymandias and Song

Authors Avatar

Abigail Baxendale R10

Pre 1900 poetry – First Draft

                 In the Victorian era society’s view on death was very different than it is today in this essay I will compare two poems from the 19th century “song” By Christina Rossetti and “Ozymandias” by P.B Shelly which have two completely opposite views on death and how you are remembered after it. “Song” by Christina Rossetti, 1830-1894, is about her expressing her humble view on death to someone close, such as a lover, and her simplicity about wanting to be remembered. On the other hand “Ozymandias” by P.B Shelley, 1792 – 1822, is about an Egyptian king who has opposing views to Rossetti on death and therefore wants to beat time in order to be remembered.

                  In the poem Ozymandias, the poet is telling us about a meeting with a “Traveller from an antique land.” Shelly uses the idea of time and distance in the first line to make the poem seem timeless. The poem then is told from the traveller’s perspective. The traveller tells the poet about a statue in the desert of an ancient king and how the statue has simply corroded away over time and left merely rubble. This idea is conveyed from lines “Two vast and trunk less legs of stone” and “near them, on the sand half sunk a shattered visage lies.” These lines also illustrate how old the poem is by the use of “Visage.” In Ozymandias you automatically have a feeling of dislike for Ozymandias this is because the poet illustrates him to be an arrogant foolish leader.  “ A wrinkled lip, and a sneer of cold command.” This could be portrayed in two different lights. That Ozymandias asked to be portrayed as a strong fierce ruler who was feared by all. Or it could also mean that the sculptor captured him in his true colours as a cold, cruel and unpleasant man. Which again makes you against the character and have little sympathy for him. Similar emotions are highlighted when  'My name is Ozymandias, king of kings: Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!' this shows that he was arrogant enough to think that he could beat time when all that was left was nothing and how he thought possessions would equal immortality. But the situational irony in this poem being Ozymandias has been remembered for long after death through P.B Shelley’s poem but not as a feared, powerful ruler as he would have hoped but instead for his arrogance and foolishness. The inscription upon the statue is also ironic for the words are egotistical but are on a ruined statue which will no longer make other rulers afraid but just laugh.

Join now!

                  In Song however, there is a complete contrasting view on death. It seems to me that Christina Rossetti is talking to a lover after death. She is telling them not to mourn and to not hold on to the memory of her. As she herself accepts her fate and how we all die. That once we die you do not need to be remembered as it will not affect her once she has gone. She knows that she cannot change and accepts the natural end to life and the simplicity of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay