Pre 1914 Prose Fiction - Stories of Mystery

Authors Avatar

Compare the ways in which the authors of ‘The Tell Tale Heart, ‘The Sea Raiders’, ‘The Goblins who Stole a Sexton’ and ‘The Yellow Face’ create an atmosphere of tension and mystery to involve the reader, and discuss how these stories are characteristic of the period in which they were written (19th Century).

Each writer creates a unique feeling of mystery and tension in each of their respective stories, and the authors accomplish this in many different, varied ways.

In ‘The Tell Tale Heart’, Edgar Allan Poe uses emotive vocabulary to build up a feeling of tension and excitement. His clever use of repetition builds up the feeling of madness and obsession that is experienced by the story’s central character; phrases such as ‘steadily, steadily’ 1 and ‘stealthily, stealthily2. The distinct lack of direct speech in the story paves the way for description, and Poe uses this to great effect. This use of strong emotive vocabulary expresses the nature of the narrator extremely well; his description of the old man’s ‘vulture eye3 clearly demonstrates that the narrator is not entirely sane. For some reason unbeknownst to the reader, the narrator develops a hate of the old man that stems from his ‘evil eye4, and his twisted logic leads him to decide to kill the old man, ‘and thus rid myself of the eye for ever 5. This therefore puts the reader on edge and makes him feel tense; the sheer fact that the narrator is so determined to prove that he is not insane immediately raises eyebrows, for a completely sane man does not go around trying to prove so. His unstable mental state is once again demonstrated when the narrator describes how he approached the murder of the old man; he is proud of his meticulous preparation, the long hours spent inching his head into the old man’s bedroom, and argues with the reader that a man lacking sanity would not be so careful when planning such a crime. The reader soon realizes that the fear of the vulture eye has consumed the narrator, who has now become a victim to the madness that he had hoped to elude, heightening the tension in the story greatly.

 Poe then builds on the foundations he has set early in the story, and the eerie tension increases about a third of the way in. He describes the narrator’s nightly visits to the old man’s chambers, in which he, once again, uses repetition to exemplify the narrator’s obsessive insanity; ‘cautiously, oh, so cautiously6. This leads us to expect something is about to happen, or that the narrator is about to do something shocking; the narrator himself is acting cautiously, so he is obviously wary of what he may find on the other side of the door. The narrator ‘took an hour to place my whole head within the opening7, another obvious quote that shows the reader that the narrator is definitely not sane. Again, the narrator is pleased with his careful planning: ‘would a madman have been so wise as this? 8 The narrator is always asking questions to the reader, therefore letting the reader use their imagination to fill in the gaps that are left cleverly by Poe, and this method can often be far more effective than having everything right before the reader; this way, the reader creates his own tension, because he is forced to use his imagination and can therefore imagine things that are not put into the story. The narrator then describes the old man’s eye, and says ‘it haunted me9; we are not given a reason for this, and therefore it is as if the narrator deems it natural, and that the reader would also dislike the old man’s eye if he saw it. The clear reference to Shakespeare’s Macbeth, when the rays of light from his lantern rest upon ‘the damned spot10 has a strong effect on the reader, as this phrase is from the very tense scene where Lady Macbeth is trying to wash the imaginary blood furiously from her hands. Another similarity with Macbeth from this story is the narrator’s aural hallucinations, which can be compared to when Macbeth murders Duncan; a knocking sound, perhaps of Duncan’s heartbeat can apparently be heard by Macbeth, even after he is dead.

The fact that the narrator appears to feel no remorse or guilt about what he has done makes the story very chilling, tense and mysterious. When the narrator tells the reader about how he disposed of the body, he tells it in such a matter of fact way; ‘First of all I dismembered the corpse.’ 11 Poe’s use of the psychopath as the main character creates the strong atmosphere that he wanted, as psychopaths are always associated with mystery and horror. This is used to great effect by Poe to play with the emotions of the reader, slowly building up the tension to a shocking climax. The narrator’s aural hallucinations send shivers down the reader’s spine, for what sane man believes he can hear a dead man’s heartbeat? He is so sure that the noise he can hear is not inside his head, ‘I found that the noise was not within my ears12, and he strongly believes that the noise he can hear is the beating of the old mans heart. The fact that he believes the policemen are mocking him when they cannot hear the heartbeat too sets off a feeling of irrational despair and panic within him that finally climaxes with the heartbeat becoming so loud that the narrator finally cracks. This is obviously one of the tensest parts of the story, in which the reader becomes totally immersed in the growing tension.

Poe uses first person narration for a number of ways in this story; if it were told in third person, for example, the narrator’s insanity and obsessiveness would not be nearly as well expressed. In first person, it is as if the reader is inside the mind of the narrator, so we can actually hear what he is thinking. However, as he narrates it to us we get the impression that he might only be telling us what he wants us to hear, and that there is a clever mind at work. We can get an insight into the narrator’s mind, and the fact that he believes he is innocent wouldn’t have been nearly as well put across had this story been in third person. This therefore means that all tension would have been lost had the story been narrated in third person, and therefore would have been not nearly as effective.

This method of writing varies greatly to that of H.G.Wells’ short story, ‘The Sea Raiders’, an early science fiction novel detailing the appearance of a group of man eating cephalopods off the coast of England.

Unlike Poe, Wells relies on a mixture of objective and subjective vocabulary to turn an entirely fictional story into a seemingly factual account. The first and last third of this story have an entirely objective feel to them, whilst the main ‘drama’ of the story only occurs in the middle third. This contrasts greatly to Poe’s story, which is dramatic from the very first line. The opening paragraph immediately strikes the reader as uncannily scientific, as the paragraph gives names, dates and geographical locations that could all be genuine. The Latin usage of the name, ‘Haploteuthis ferox’ shows once again an analytical and precise manner about which the cephalopods are described, and as Latin names are only given to creatures that are actually in existence, the reader is immediately uncertain as to whether this is fact or fiction. It comes across to the reader that the opening paragraph could have been plucked from a scientific journal in the way it is written. This is completely adverse to Poe’s story, in which, although plausible, the reader is more or less aware straight away that it is not intended to be taken as a fictional account. Wells decided to narrate this story in third person, presumably to maintain the neutral, objective standpoint, which again contrasts with Poe who decided to use first person, to increase the feeling of tension. Because the opening few pages are so seemingly accurate and factual, a mysterious atmosphere is created; the reader is made to wonder whether this story is true or not, and therefore the reader is unsure of what is fact and what is fiction. The whole point of science fiction novels are to make the reader wonder whether the story could have been true, whether it could have happened, and this early example is no exception. On the other hand, if Wells’ intentions were to create a dramatic story which was not intended to have a hint of fact about it, this factual style would not have been a good choice at all.

Join now!

This concise and factual style continues well into the first page and a half, with Wells describing how so little is known about these mysterious creatures; his objective manner once again leads the reader to believe the story could have a hint of truth in it. ‘In no department of zoological science13, ‘a cachalot was killed of Terceira14 are written in such a matter of fact and prosaic way that the least the reader can do is consider their credibility. Wells’ clever use of scientific terminology would also fool a less widely read reader; some may think he is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay