Search for My Tongue Sujata Bhatt Possible themes: Identity; Living between two cultures; Language; Race.

Authors Avatar

Search for My Tongue – Sujata Bhatt

You ask me what I mean
by saying I have lost my tongue.
I ask you, what would you do
if you had two tongues in your mouth,
and lost the first one, the mother tongue,
and could not really know the other,
the foreign tongue.
You could not use them both together
even if you thought that way.
And if you lived in a place you had to
speak a foreign tongue,
your mother tongue would rot,
rot and die in your mouth
until you had to spit it out.
I thought I spit it out
but overnight while I dream,


(munay hutoo kay aakhee jeebh aakhee bhasha)

(may thoonky nakhi chay)
(parantoo rattray svupnama mari bhasha pachi aavay chay)

(foolnee jaim mari bhasha nmari jeebh)

(modhama kheelay chay)

(fullnee jaim mari bhasha mari jeebh)

(modhama pakay chay)


it grows back, a stump of a shoot
grows longer, grows moist, grows strong veins,
it ties the other tongue in knots,
the bud opens, the bud opens in my mouth,
it pushes the other tongue aside.
Everytime I think I've forgotten,
I think I've lost the mother tongue,
it blossoms out of my mouth.


Search for My Tongue – Sujata Bhatt

Possible themes: Identity; Living between two cultures; Language; Race.

Join now!

Sujata Bhatt – Search for my Tongue

This poem is about Sujata Bhatt being afraid that she was losing her identity as a Gujarati-speaking Indian.   It comes from a time when she was in America studying English, and feared she was being ‘Americanised’, and forgetting her first language (her ‘mother tongue’)

The content of the poem consists of the poet writes about losing her tongue, by which she means forgetting how to speak her mother tongue because she had always to speak English (‘the foreign tongue’).  

Then, however, as she dreams, her mother tongue re-asserts ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

This essay is of a good quality, though at times it lacks flow and feels like a selection of jumbled ideas. This could be solved by discussing the poem in chronological order and by making links between paragraphs to draw ideas together. I should highlight that having paragraphs that are just a couple of sentences doesn’t work, it’s important to go into more depth when discussing key points. Generally there are no real issues with spelling or grammar, though there are occasions where words seem to be missing, this is likely due to typing errors. I would recommend that this is throughly proof read to overcome these errors. Proof reading also gives you a chance to come into more details and discussing points you hadn’t come across the first time round. Overall the candidate shows a good understanding and has used a good range of vocabulary to discuss their ideas.

The candidate uses appropriate quotations and a good level of analysis when discussing key ideas within the poem. However when discussing the language used the candidate fails to mention the chatty nature of the first part of the poem, the poet use language in way that makes the reader feel as though she is having a conversation with them, which encourages the reader to read the rest of the poem. On a positive note the candidate successfully discusses linguistic terms, including the most important metaphor, that the poet’s first language is growing in her mouth like a flower. In addition s/he understands the poets emotions and feelings throughout the poem, a good example of where this is discussed, is when s/he mentions how the use of repetition shows the poet’s excitement about her mother tongue coming back to her. This shows that the candidate understands that the poem is highlighting the difficulties between being part of two cultures. This way of thinking is key to achieving a C grade and above at this level of qualification. Although the candidate ends on a personal note, which I think is a nice touch, there is no solid conclusion. A conclusion should answer the initial question, summarise your key points and ideas and include your personal opinions of the poem. This is important as it brings the essay to a close and gives you a chance to leave the reader with a good impression.

This a good example of the points that need to be discussed at this level. The candidate has some good ideas and successfully uses appropriate technical terms. The candidate has included their plan, and I feel that they have struggled to convert this into a structured essay, the essay jumps from point to point but doesn’t seem to flow and at times appears is an uneven collaboration of ideas from the plan. My advice would be to talk about the poem as it progresses, what to the first few lines mean, how do they make you feel? what do they make you think of? are linguistic techniques used? if so which ones, what effect do they have? Then go on the next lines and the next etc. The essay would feel less disjointed if the candidate had approached it in this manor. A structured essay with clear points is easier for the reader to follow, therefore it is easier to see wether or the candidate has mentioned the poem’s structure and linguistic techniques used by the poet, this are essential points for achieving a high grade.