• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should animals be used for scientific research?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should the animals be used for scientific research? Due to the inexorable advancement in the medical field, the world is becoming more and more dependent on animal testing to ensure that the new medicines which are being produced on a daily basis are of benefit to humans and do not possess any negative side effects. In my opinion, animal testing has a vital role in facilitating the advancement of medicine, and therefore is essential for us humans. Despite the notorious publicity that animal testing possess, I think that its advantages overweight its disadvantages. ...read more.

Middle

I do agree that the remaining 7% of animal tests should include depressants to prevent animals from suffering, however, this is no reason to stop animal testing. Also, the majority of the human population eats meat products in a daily basis day, yet no one argues that this is "cruel". If animal testing was not used, there would be no other accurate alternative except for human testing. And, I think that it is an undeniable fact that a human life is by far more valuable than that of an animal. There are a few modern alternatives that had evolved recently to substitute animal testing, most of which depend of computers and other types of modern day technology. ...read more.

Conclusion

Plant tests are also inaccurate as the anatomical structure of plants are very different from that of humans, so plants can have different reactions to certain substances than humans, causing them to be inaccurate. In my opinion, we still have a long way to reach the level of advancement to enable us to reach accurate alternatives for animal testing. Meanwhile, animal testing will be the main method of testing chemicals for the benefit of humans. I believe that those who oppose this argument should look at the priorities we have as human beings and concur that our wellbeing is considerably superior to that of animals of whatever species, and that, although animal testing is, to an extent, unethical, it is much better than human testing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A good case is made here for the use of animals for drug testing. However the essay is rather short for a GCSE submission. More use of the "some critics say" strategy of paragraph 3 could be employed and there could be some actual case histories. Also, more could be said about how the animals are treated generally.

There is a sprinkling of grammar mistakes, particularly verb agreements.

3 stars

Marked by teacher Jeff Taylor 20/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Argumentative Writing - Are we too dependent on computers?

    3 star(s)

    Students say that they do feel they are too dependent on computers at time when it comes to their projects and fear it may be a disadvantage in the near future. Is it? A poll conducted in January 2004 by more than 2000 voters around the world claim that the majority, with 1002 votes, believe they are a 'computer geek/nerd'.

  2. Why I believe Euthanasia Should be banned

    History has an eerie way of repeating itself. If Hitler began his campaign for euthanasia on the premises that terminal patients with unbearable pain should be given the dignity of a death surrounded by loved ones, and ended it with the extermination of all mentally ill, old or mildly sick people, wouldn't history repeat on a greater scale if euthanasia became legal?

  1. Should the private lives of politicians be open to public scrutiny?

    By keeping this door open, we can hold politicians accountable of their own actions and they will be recognized as good role models for the citizens. This is also the price we pay to sustain a free press and democracy in a country.

  2. Has Scientific Technology and Developments Gone Too Far

    On the other hand, as we all know, if it is possible to clone an animal, it should technically be possible to clone a human. I am totally against this idea of having someone that looks like you and thinks like you or the idea of bringing people back from

  1. Satirical Writing

    Like tomorrow's weather forecast, the typical British personality is cold and gloomy, with a little chance of a sunny disposition. But hey, at least they have their "stiff upper lip". Perhaps it's frozen in place. But really when did the British myth of having a "stiff upper lip", denoting that they suffered quietly through adversity, come in to being.

  2. An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind

    that you could keep on reading, because the part below is about the idol of all Indians. ?An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.? This was the one quote that stood out to me from all of the other quotes that occurred in the well-known film ?Gandhi?.

  1. The effects of technology on teenagers

    My main point is that what goes on the Internet stays on the Internet and could most likely end up downloaded on someone?s computer.

  2. Evaluate whether the ethical as well as moral issues are important enough to stop ...

    -The various animal and human testing projects human benefits of which are achieved I said not to be achievable via the use of other methods. -Animal and human testing ensures as well as enforces the safety of drugs before they put on the market to be sold to the public.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work