Social behaviour Pygmalion and LoF

Authors Avatar

In Pygmalion by Bernard Shaw, the importance of different social behaviour is used to great extent. In fact, the whole play is based on the difference between social classes: If they did not exist, Mr. Higgins’ and Colonel Pickering’s bet would never have taken place. The whole plot is based on Eliza Doolittle’s ascension from a “draggletailed guttersnipe” (Higgins) to a full-fledged duchess and princess.

Throughout the play, there is a clear distinction in the ways and manners between people from different social classes. The obvious example is in the beginning of act 1, when Eliza’s accent is transcribed: “Theres menners f’yer!” (The Flower Girl). Another poor accent is that of Eliza’s father: The H is omitted in his lines (”Iggins”). This is in contrast to the accents of the ladies and gentlemen, which are transcribed just like regular, written English.

I believe that it is important to note how the professor’s transformation of Eliza is reflected in the manuscript: The change in her accent — which is even pointed out as being too good for a native speaker — is much more emphasized than the change in her manners and her looks, for only the first day is it mentioned that she takes a bath, and only once are the jewels decorating her during the garden party at the Buckingham Palace mentioned.

Morals, however, are completely independent of social class. Shaw shows us both types of personalities in both classes: Eliza, the good girl despite her being very poor, and her father, who ruthlessly touches rich gentlemen in order to make them aid him economically. The Colonel is very generous and gentle, even if Mr. Higgins is not always so.

My conclusion is that the social classes in Pygmalion are deeply emphasized and of great importance to the play. However, there are human qualities that not even social class can change.

Pygmalion looks at the superficiality of upper class society, a society in which social status is determined by the language that one speaks, one's manners, and the clothes one wears. It is astounding that Higgins is able to pass Eliza off as an elite, and Hungarian royalty at that, merely by altering her appearance and speech. The wealthy are so superficial they can not see past Eliza's appearance. On a deeper level, Pygmalion addresses the social ills in England at the turn of the century. Victorian England was characterized by extreme class division and limited, to no, social mobility. Language separated the elite from the lower class. In Pygmalion, Eliza's dialect inhibits her from procuring a job in a flower shop; Pygmalion is about the universal truth that all people are worthy of respect and dignity, from the wealthy nobleman to the beggar on the street corner. The difference between a common flower girl and a duchess, apart from appearance and demeanour, is the way she is treated. Treat the flower girl as if she were a duchess, worthy of respect and decency, and she will become a better person as a result.

OR

How important is it to the success of this novel that the characters are schoolboys? You should refer closely to language, events and characters in your answer.

----------------------------                

I think that the author used children instead of adults because it demonstrated that way cliques and groups form amongst children during anarchy and how one kid is always in charge of each group. And fear obviously affected them more because of there maturity level. Because there were kids of all ages they had to support each other while keeping there fearful emotions within themselves so they can form a more perfect hypothetical government.

He used boys because people often think of boys as easily drawn to violence, war, etc, young boys are just a younger version of men(obviously), men have always been the ones who started wars, etc in history. We naturally think of boys/men as testosterone driven creatures, where woman are nurturing, loving, rational, etc(as skewed as that thinking may be). Think of when we see little boys getting into trouble, fighting, etc. Most people just say, well boys will be boys. As opposed to girls doing the same thing, it would be handled/looked at differently.

Many people think a group of girls would have been less drawn to savagery, maybe worked together better, not looked for a leader, but rather coexisted as equals, etc. It is unknown since Golding did not write about girls. I myself think the outcome would have been different, since males and females are different in actions. There was a book written with girls by another author.

The reason he uses British boys is because British people are also seen as polite, well behaved, etc. He adds a bit more to the shock, by making them from a private school. The decent into savagery is much greater than if these boys were inner city youth, from the bad part of town. We like to think that this kind of violence is not in civilized society and we have gotten so far past our violent savage beginning, that nothing could revert us back.

Coursework.info

In “Lord of the flies” we see a group of boys starting off as civilised people and ending up as savages. Trace the disintegration of the boys’ standards.

“Lord of the flies” is a novel written by William Golding about a group of public school boys who’s plane is shot down over a paradise island during a time of war. In this essay I will trace and explain the disintegration of the boys standards as they struggle to survive on a remote island with no adults.

At the beginning of the novel the reader is presented with a group of school boys, brought up to the highest standards, who have always been guided by adults, learning what it right and what is wrong, keeping within their limits. Now they have no adults to guide them. Their upbringing is reflected in their characters a lot at the beginning of the novel, but as the novel goes on the boys start to lose track as they have to make the decision to play by the rules or to have some fun.

The first character that the reader meets is Ralph, once Ralph gets over the initial excitement of being on a paradise island with no adults he immediately starts to set rules and bring some kind of order to the boys. Ralph and Piggy find a conch, which is set to become the symbol of democracy on the island. Ralph is smartly dressed and has fair hair, with stockings and his posh public school uniform, very ordered and smart. These clothes and Ralph’s appearance reflect his mind, very clever and ordered. Once it has been established that there are no adults and they are definitely on an island Ralph immediately thinks of rescue, and survival on the island. Ralph first meets Piggy, who, like his name suggests is of a rather large build. Piggy is very intelligent and has good general knowledge. Piggy always wants to do what is correct and always wants to join in with everything, Piggy is a sensitive character. Piggy takes on the role of the sensible adult. Piggy looks after the little children and takes everybody’s names.

When the conch is first blown by Ralph, lots of other children are drawn to the sound, and follow the sound to meet Ralph and Piggy, when the children realise that there are no adults on the island there is a sense of panic but also excitement.

        

“Aren’t there any grown ups?”

Jack Merridew keeps questioning Ralph as to if there are any grown ups. When Ralph then suggests that they should elect a chief Jack immediately announces that he should be chief as he is the head choirboy. The choir are very formal dressed from “throat to ankle” in long black cloaks. They have a very sophisticated appearance, and march in time. Jack is their leader. Jack is the obvious leader. He is a strong and dominant character. The boys have an election. The voting for a leader seems like a game to the boys.

Join now!

        

“The toy of voting was almost as pleasing as the conch.”

The boys from the choir automatically vote for Jack, but everybody else votes for Ralph as he has the conch, the symbol of power and authority at the beginning of the novel. Ralph shows what a good leader he is when he offers Jack the leadership of the choir.

        

“The choir belongs to you, of course. They could be the army, or hunters.”

All through out the novel Jack continuously tries to expand his leadership. Jack takes on the choir as hunters.

The hunting ...

This is a preview of the whole essay