• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Stalingrad was the most significant turning point of the war on the Eastern Front for both the Soviet Army and the Wehrmacht.' To what extent do you agree with this interpretation? Use all of the sources and your own knowledge to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Stalingrad was the most significant turning point of the war on the Eastern Front for both the Soviet Army and the Wehrmacht.' To what extent do you agree with this interpretation? Use all of the sources and your own knowledge to explain your answer. The Battle of Stalingrad occurred in 1943, and led to the Germans losing to the Soviet army. In my opinion, the Battle of Stalingrad was not the most important turning point in the war because the majority of the German army were still on the Eastern Front, with many weapons, tanks and aircraft to use in battle. I feel that the battle was a morale turning point for the Russians, since they had fended off the Germans and re-captured Stalingrad. The Germans lost 70 000 men and 2000 tanks. Good propaganda was made, and b the boosted Soviet morale. The workers started to produce more aircraft and tanks and eventually, any armour lost in battle could be replaced. Source B supports the view that the battle was a Soviet morale booster, because it shows the destruction of Stalingrad, which implies that the battle was b****y and the Russians managed to win. ...read more.

Middle

The Battle of Stalingrad was not a military turning point for the Germans as although they lost the battle, it was only the German 6th Army Infantry Division that was defeated. They still had most of their armoured divisions and troops on the Eastern Front ready for use in war. An example of this is at the Battle of Kharkov in March 1943, where the Germans re-captured the city from the Russians after much street fighting. 240 000 Russians were captured. This shows that the Germans still had the capabilities to win a battle and also, to hold a long, drawn out campaign. Source A supports the view that the battle was a military turning point for the Germans, because it describes them collapsing and facing an inevitable defeat. Source G also shows that the German army was unaffected by the loss at Stalingrad because they went on to win at Kharkov as 'masters of the field'. It was written 30 years after the war, which meant that the British historian, who wrote it, would not have any reason to be biased. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Russians had 400 more aircraft than the Germans, and so these aircraft achieved air superiority for the Russians. This then allowed them to attack German tanks very easily with anti-tank rockets. The Russians had 3600 tanks and the Germans had 2700, which gave the Russians an advantage. After the Battle of Kursk, the German army on the Eastern Front was destroyed, and so this left a clear path for the Russians to Berlin. Foreign aid is an important turning point as well. The Russians received many resources and weapons from the Allies and without them, Russia might not have won. The Allies also destroyed German factories and rail links between Germany and the USSR, which significantly halted to process of building German armour. In conclusion, I feel that the Battle of Stalingrad was not the most important turning point in the war, since the Germans had the majority of the armoured forces still left on the Eastern Front. This view is best supported by Source G. I feel that the most significant turning point in the war was the Battle of Kursk because it was where the Germans lost all their tanks and aircraft. It signalled the beginning of a slow retreat by the Germans and ended in an Allied victory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Pre 1914 War Poetry - The Drum and Drummer Hodge analysed.

    The first stanza is in an ABAB rhyming pattern: They throw in Drummer Hodge, to rest Uncoffined - just as found: His landmark is a kopje-crest That breaks the veldt around; And foreign constellations west Each night above his mound.

  2. Britain and the Western Front.

    the heavy weight held back the offensive, causing a mass murder crisis on the first day of battle. A diary entry written by Sir Douglas Haig himself, explains the morale of the British soldiers before the battle, illustrating a mood of sure success and superior movement of the offensive attack, which the soldiers had been instructed to complete.

  1. How did the Romans View the Britons and the conquest?

    All of our modern technology truly shows me what an incredibly advanced nation we are, especially in comparison with the Brittunculi. The rooms we stay in are extremely crowded, and hold 8 people, although I believe even four people would be uncomfortable in rooms these small.

  2. Saving Private Ryan Examine Steven Spielberg's use of images and Presentation of war. ...

    The sounds from know on are diegetic this is to show the reality of war. The sound effect is dominated by gunfire, as this is very loud. We hear the sounds of bullets hitting their targets. Sometimes we'll hear someone shouting instructions but this isn't very distinctive as the non

  1. Compare the presentation of war in the Olivier and Branagh versions of 'Henry V'. ...

    None of them look dirty, b****y or tired. Here Henry speaks very clearly with no fear at all. We would have not guessed they had been in a battle. There is no sense of death of injuries. This is very unrealistic and seems like a game to the men.

  2. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    Most replacements had as little as nine hours flying time and no combat training. The Luftwaffe refered to these pilots as "cannon fodder". At this point the multinational nature of the RAF came to the fore. With many pilots from the Dominions already serving in Fighter Command-Australians, South Africans, New

  1. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    On many radio broadcasts it was reported that more German planes were shot down than actually were. In some cases three or four times as many. This would keep the pilots morale high and they would in turn retain their determination.

  2. Using your knowledge of the Battle acquired during the trip and by referring to ...

    Three weeks of continuos shelling softened up the German trenches and cut barbed wire so the troops could move effectively and quickly on the ground. The capturing of the Ridge was also very quick - it only took until early afternoon for all three of the enemy trenches to be captured.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work