The Crucible - Power and Manipulation

Authors Avatar

Mohamed Mohamed             Candidate number: 4131                Centre number: 20243

English Coursework: ‘The Crucible.’

“The play is a study of power and manipulation.”

 Select any three or four characters and explain how they illustrate the abuse of power.

Since 1938 an organisation called the House Un-American Activities Committee had been in existence in America. This organisation had the power to investigate any movement or person who was an apparent threat to the safety of the state. Under the chairmanship of Senator Joseph McCarthy, this committee became paranoid in it’s searching out of communist sympathisers among the American people in the late 1940’s and early 1950’s. There were real fears in America that the philosophy of communism would eventually undermine and destroy capitalism and the ‘American’ way of life. Almost any criticism of the government or its instructions happened to be, in the eyes of McCarthy, an entry of obedience to communism.

Arthur Miller wrote many plays which shared a similar theme to ‘The Crucible’. In 1950 Arthur Miller had written an adaptation of Ibsen’s ‘An Enemy of the People’ dealing with an individual who insists he is right whilst the vast majority are wrong. Millers ‘Death of a Salesman’ 1949 also had a universal theme; an individuals stand for what he believes to be morally right against the threats of an immoral society. Finally, Millers’ ‘All my Sons’ 1947 was a successful stage play as well as a successful film. The play dealt with the difficulties of an individual in society, coping with pressure and at the same time retaining his dignity.

‘The Crucible’, written by Arthur Miller was based on real historical happenings in Salem, Massachusetts 1692. It was first produced in 1953 in the middle of the McCarthy political ‘Witch-Hunt’ in America, even though the story had appealed to the playwright for many years. The activities of the Committee inspired Miller, and the witch-craft trials which had taken place in the American town of Salem, settled in Miller’s mind. For example, the Committee had lists of people and wanted the witnesses to name names, after observing this Miller took it into consideration for his play. When Miller was merely a young adult he had attended a socialist conference during the McCarthy period, when the Senator was first creating Hysteria concerning Communism. This is what inspired Miller to make Hysteria the main theme of his play. Additionally Miller was also brought in front of the court and was questioned about his loyalty to Communism; this also gave Miller an idea for his forthcoming play. Miller’s inspiration came from real life events making his play very realistic as well as coherent.

One of the most crucial themes in this play is ‘Hysteria’. Throughout the play we are able to see the role that hysteria can play in destroying a community. Hysteria replaces logic and enables the people in Salem to believe that their neighbours, whom they have always considered to be upstanding people, are committing absurd and incongruous crimes, for example communing with the devil, killing babies etc.

‘The Crucible’ is set in a theocratic society, a religious community in which the church and the state are one. The religion was very strict; a harsh form of Protestantism known as Puritanism. Because of the theocratic nature of the society, moral laws and state laws were one and the same; sin and the status of an individual’s soul were matters of public concern. There was no room for divergence from social norms, since any individual whose personal life did not conform to the recognized moral laws represented a threat, not only to the public good but to the rule of God and true religion as well. In Salem everyone and everything belonged to either God or the Devil; disagreement was not only unlawful but was associated with satanic activity. This overview functioned as the under-lying logic behind the witch-trials. Arthur Miller said that he wrote about ‘An imploded community that distrust and paranoia had killed’.

Miller has demonstrated in his play that the people who were strongly associated to the church were those who were most unlikely to be suspected or even accused of witch-craft. We are able to see that the theocratic society did not provide the community of Salem with many choices; they either followed the church or alternatively the devil. This then reinforced the Salem community to become a part of the congregation and regular church attendees. In Act 3, Judge Danforth say’s: “A person is either with this court or he must be counted against it.” This represents intolerance of the society. We can also assume that the church and the court both worked as one to create an image for the Salem society which showed that the church and court consisted of individuals who were God-loving and righteous, so anyone who did not follow either the church or court, was immediately thought to be dis-loyal to God and would then be further suspected of witch-craft.

Join now!

Furthermore we are also able to observe how important attending church was to other characters in the play, for example, John Proctor was not a regular church attendee. The Salem Society now had one over John; even though we are aware that it is a completely unreasonable thought, the society could have claimed that the reason why John did not attend church was because he had been communing with the devil.

Another absurd incident is when Giles Corey becomes suspicious of his wife Martha Corey because she would read a book every night instead of the bible.

...

This is a preview of the whole essay