The duality of the ever-dreamy Tom Wingfield.

Authors Avatar

        The duality of the ever-dreamy Tom Wingfield. The faded southern belle who could not face the fact that her prime time is up. The shyly old-fashioned and fragile Laura Wingfield. How could Tennessee Williams daringly put these mixtures of personalities under one roof as a lower-middle class American family who lacked a father figure? All three characters are clearly described as characters who ‘manufacture illusions’ that, in the end, are finally destroyed by reality; thus how can it be possible for all three to live together as responsible family members? In Tennessee Williams’ “The Glass Menagerie”, it is all about the distortion of reality and the struggle between differentiating reality and appearance. Williams almost unrealistically and literally ‘distorted reality’ itself as he mixed the impossible Amanda, Tom and Laura Wingfield into one batter of bittersweet yet fragile family dependence and responsibility, whereupon Amanda acts as the second provider of the family and the one who ensures her children’s success, Tom being responsible as the father-figure replacement in the family and Laura as the dependent character who is only responsible for minor domestic issues.

Amanda Wingfield is a character of utmost complexity. Amanda, as had been explained by Williams himself, “is not paranoiac but her life is paranoia.” A faded southern belle who had a traditional southern upbringing, Amanda can be safely said as one of the most unrealistic characters of the story as she had suffered a drastic economic and social reversal in her life. Although her husband had left her, she often gives the impression as if her husband is merely traveling and will be back, whereupon she praises him one moment and defames him the next. This proves that Amanda lives a life of paranoia, withdrawing from reality into fantasies; often times seeing things that are not there, a confused character of inconsistencies and illusions. We see a glimpse of this and how she sets high and often unrealistic goals and expectations for her children when Amanda conveys to Laura after her daughter wearily argues that she is not bound for marriage as she is physically disadvantaged, “Nonsense! Laura, I’ve told you never, never to use that word. Why, you’re not crippled, you just have a little defect-hardly noticeable even! (Williams, 45).” But Laura, in real life, is a passive, shy woman who is disadvantaged by her slight cripple.  Other than these attributions, Amanda can also be seen as a headstrong, gentle and almost wise patronizing mother who cares very much for her own children’s welfare and success. Although she may seem terribly pushy at times, tenderness exists in her strong endurance and tireless persistence of nagging to make sure the success of her children even in the most trivial issues, proving again that she is a character that has good intentions but is simply deeply flawed, hence misunderstood. Her willingness to sacrifice for the ones that she love is shown as she willingly accepts her job as a humiliating magazine subscription sales woman to enhance Laura’s chances of marriage and by putting Laura to a business college to ensure her success in life, which resulted in a dismal failure.

Join now!

Due to Laura’s passively shy personality and physical disadvantage, Amanda’s motherly responsibility towards Laura as her caretaker is to ensure that she is properly married and successful in her future life so that she may not become like Amanda herself; a woman who is abandoned by her husband and suffering from an economic and social reversal. Although Amanda mostly depends on Tom economically, her responsibility towards both Laura and Tom serves as the second family provider, using the money she makes to enhance Laura’s marriage and success prospects by putting her to business college.

To Amanda, Tom is her ...

This is a preview of the whole essay