The Handmaid’s Tale

This sudden change brought the country to its knees that resulted in the quick takeover by the new regime. This level of takeover would require either a large atomic revolution or a biological warfare of great magnitude.

Uncertainty within some third world countries could lead to attempts of these types of risks. These countries are viewed as terrorist based or unstable political governments who will spend what is required to obtain the power.

The Indian government is an example of this in today's world as well as the case of Iraq of the past few years. However, the story is based on Gilead with its boundaries best described to be the former city of Cambridge

Massachusetts. This city had checkpoints with guards and walls to contain

the limits. It also allowed visitors to the city for people to view the culture and its habitants. This would leave one to believe this could have been an isolated case that may have resulted in the takeover of a state or city alone, and if so how would it survive attacks from governing bodies? Current history has a case that could assimilate the Handmaids tale in Gilead. This case is of the cult within the Waco Texas society that was attacked by the FBI and forced to surrender under terms not even considered to be humane by some. This society lived by its own rules and beliefs in both religion and with force. The government of the U.S. monitored the cult closely until such a time determined it was time to action for the release of the people. This action by the government led to the total destruction of all of the members of the community by certain death from the attack on the camp.

---------------------------- Each Handmaid was considered to be "OF" their commander. These symbolisms placed ownership of the Handmaid directly to the commander and all were on equal statuses. Offred, Ofglen, Ofwarren, to name a few, were the Handmaids of Fred, Glen, and Warren.

The "OF" prefix also can be construed to be demeaning to the Handmaid placing herself within the ranks of the household she resided in. Although the rank of the Handmaid could be considered to be somewhat of importance, if fertile, there were many more downsides. In today's society it is customary for the bride to adopt the name of the groom. This practice is considered by some to be completely acceptable yet to others extremely vain. Many brides now make it a point to either add the groom family name after their own or make the point to maintain each original family name. In the latter cases it is more of the family name carrying some sort of importance within the society or the wish of the family to maintain the existence of the family name. It is not unheard of for the groom to adopt the brides name if there are no other males within the generation to carry on the bride's family name. With the divorce rate maintaining its level of almost 50% it leaves many families with choices to make. Many of these families with children residing with the mother have the mother maintain the grooms name if adopted during the wedding. This is done for reasons of the children's upbringing within school districts and also within the society being that it is completely acceptable. To some males there may be great differences between both parties and potentially both families if the bride wishes to maintain her maiden name. Dependent on the families' social status or heritage it may be considered to be unethical. It would not be surprising that these differences could become irreconcilable differences leading to break ups prior to the marriages. Although the practice could be considered similar the difference lies in the ownership of the Handmaid within this story that is not a practice within the society of today in the U.S.