The Importance of the Theme of Deception in "Much Ado About Nothing"

Authors Avatar

The Importance of the Theme of Deception in “Much Ado About Nothing”

William Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing is a play based upon the drama created by a series of deliberate deceptions between the central characters; some benevolent, others malevolent. The play opens with the return of Don Pedro of Arragon, his “bastard” brother Don John and courtiers Claudio and Benedict to Messina, a country governed by Leonato-father to Hero and Uncle to Beatrice. It is quickly established with the audience that Claudio covets Hero romantically whilst Benedict is engaged in a battle of egos or “kind of merry war” with Beatrice. The contrastive relationships between these pairs of characters in turn allows the audience to identify with the dramatic tensions and psychological illusions created by open romantic love and hidden sexual attraction. The plot hinges upon instances of deceit that are developed when characters, and with them-audience, “note” one another’s behaviour and language-with regards to love and marriage. This relates to one interpretation of the play’s title. According to research, during Shakespearean times “nothing” was pronounced “noting”. The “much ado” in the title could refer to the way that much drama is created by the character’s all “noting” what each says or does. In addition to this, Shakespeare frequently used “ting” to describe the female genitalia throughout many of his plays. With the already mentioned pronunciation of “nothing” as “noting”, the title “Much Ado About Nothing” could also refer to a large fuss created about “no ting”, i.e. no sexual intercourse. This relates to Claudio’s reaction to seeing who he thinks is his wife having sex with Borachio.

In Act 1 scene 1 the audience is introduced to the history and nature of Beatrice and Benedict’s relationship, characterised as a “skirmish of wit”. The language they both use to insult each other and state their positions is passionate and emphatic. Beatrice declares that she would “rather hear her dog bark at a crow, than a man swear he loves me” whilst Benedict reveals that “truly I love none”. Both use language as a way of distancing themselves from their true feelings and consequently language becomes a means of practising self- deception. They are a good match for one another -intellectually and socially. This contrasts with the match between Claudio and Hero where he is so overwhelmed by Hero’s appearance he ascribes her qualities he does not “know” she possess. This is shown when Claudio declares that Hero is “the sweetest Lady that I ever looked on”. This reveals that Claudio has romanticised Hero based on what he sees. It is this illusion that allows Don John to maliciously deceive Claudio later in the play. It could be argued that Shakespeare knew his audience would be able to see beyond these forms of deception and question the idealistic “romantic” way Claudio sees Hero. Likewise they may recognise that behind the seemingly casual displays of wit lies true depth of feeling. Beatrice and Benedict loudly protest against love and marriage, but it is with “too much” passion. This insight allows the audience to identify more strongly with them and engage with Don Pedro’s motivation to unite them.

Join now!

Don Pedro’s plan to “humour” Beatrice so that “she shall fall in love with Benedict” builds on and develops the theme of deception further by making it more plot and character driven. Having established the self-deception of Beatrice and Benedict in Act 1 scene 1, Shakespeare introduces a plan which capitalises upon their vulnerabilities- that they deny and hide from themselves but are apparent to their friends. Leonato argues that despite being “born to speak all mirth and no matter” Beatrice nonetheless shows a “little of the melancholy element in her” and has “often dreamt of unhappiness”. Clearly there ...

This is a preview of the whole essay