The man he killed analysis. Through this poem, Hardy is expressing the human vs. social conflict. He shows the stupidity of the war as compared to the patriotic beliefs towards war of those at home

Authors Avatar

This poem is about a man who was in the war and is thinking about his memories in the war. This poem is written in first person, making us feel like it’s somebody’s own story. It’s written in a conversational tone; with speech marks included making us feel that the narrator is addressing us personally in an informal way. The poem is written in chatty language because it detracts the readers from the horrors of the war.

The narrator justifies about killing of another man in battle, and reflects on how much he and his victim had in common.

This poem was written by Thomas Hardy who was incredibly pessimistic about the society. He was very disgruntled about humanity’s place in the scheme of all things. Through this poem, he is trying to convey that there are no good reasons in fighting the war.

Join now!

In the first stanza the main two characters are introduced. The action has already taken place. The poet is therefore reflecting on the event. “Had he and I but met” – the use of word “but” gives a clue that this stanza is about an alternate situation that could’ve happened.

The idea in first stanza is in contrast to that in the second stanza. The fact that they instead met as soldiers, confronted with each other, one had to die. “Ranged as infantry” suggests that the men were not natural enemies but were “ranged” to set against each other. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay