Was Henry V an inspiring leader or a cold and severe king?

Authors Avatar

Robert Foard         30/01/07        10E

Was Henry V an inspiring leader or a cold and severe king?

 “Henry was an inspiring leader but a cold and severe king.”

 In this essay I am going to look at the evidence in the play and using this decide which of the points in this statement I agree with.

There is no doubt that Henry was a very inspirational man because, by ‘firing them up’ with his speeches he leads his troops to victory at the battle of Agincourt against all the odds.

He inspires them and fires them up getting them ready for battle by telling them they are “lords of the battlefield” and his equal. His stirring speech inspires his men and prepares them to die for King and Country if necessary. However, Shakespeare shows us in the play that Henry can be very cold and severe. For example, he executes his friends Bardolph and Nym for stealing from a holy place.   He also rejects and casts his best friend Falstaff away and as the play informs us, he “kills his heart.”

Henry is inspiring and cold and severe depending on the situation. In the previous plays Henry was a young mischievous boy but in this play it shows Henrys’ great transformation from a young wild boy into a great king. This explains his actions towards Falstaff.

Henry’s actions during the play can be interpreted in different ways. For example when he executes his best friends Bardolph and Nymn for robbing a French church, this could be seen as cold and severe as it is very harsh. Others would think that this is very inspiring because it shows that he has moved away from his old wild days and has matured. It shows that he will not stand for any nonsense and no one is above the law, particularly as he saw this act as being made against God. Also, when King Henry rejects his old best friend Falstaff, many people would think he is being very cold and the only reason why he casts him away is because he has a higher social status than him now and Falstaff is not worthy. Henry could not possibly be seen consorting with a hoodlum. Falstaff must have been very hurt when Henry did this because he ended up dieing and Mistress Quickly said “The king has killed his heart”. Others would see this as Henry maturing even more. He is moving away from his irresponsible childhood ways and becoming a wise statesman and a great king.

When French soldiers raid the English camp and kill all of the luggage boys, Henry cannot control his rage so he orders all of the French prisoners to be killed. Some people would think this is cold and severe because it is needless bloodshed, others would think it was inspiring because he has avenged the luggage boys’ deaths: he demonstrates he will not tolerate this sort of action and this sends the right message to his enemies. When he executes these soldiers he is doing it in the best interest of his country and his position as king. This shows Henry’s rage, up until then in the play Henry was a calm and collected fellow.

Join now!

Henry also shows his cold and severe side when he threatens Harfleur: “Your fathers taken by the silver beards, and the most reverend heads dashed to the walls.” This shows Henry’s ruthlessness because it is a malicious thing to do, but Henry is doing it in the best interest of his country as by making Harfleur surrender, he is limiting the loss of men from his army. He uses religion in his speech to make it sound worse and harsher. When he says “Reverend” it makes it sound religious any therefore making the whole speech sound harsh.

When he forces ...

This is a preview of the whole essay