• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Happened To the Romanov Family?

Extracts from this document...


Siobhan Mitchell 10A/Pk What Happened To the Romanov Family? (a) Study Sources A and B. Sources A and B give similar accounts. Does this mean they are reliable? Source A and Source B give similar accounts. However, this does not mean they are reliable. Source A is from a report in an American newspaper, in December 1918. Source B is from Sir Charles Eliot's report to the British government. The sources agree on the fact that some murders took place in the Ipatiev house. They also agree on believing that some of the family and those with them may have escaped. However, in source A, its states that Sergeyev believes that the Empress, the Tsar's son, and the four other children were not shot ...read more.


Therefore Source B is dependent on Source A. However, Sergeyev was the first in the house and the first to see the evidence so he might have the best idea of what actually happened in the house. Source A is from a newspaper. The caption below states 'Sergeyev's findings are known only from comments of people who spoke to him or read his report.' This indicates that the knowledge is second hand and information may have distorted as one person told another. This questions the reliability of this source. Also, because it is from a newspaper, may have had a purpose. They may have said that the tsar's son was not shot in the house to raise hopes that Russia could go back to being ruled by the Romanov family. ...read more.


However, in Source C, an extract from a book by Judge Sokolov, Sokolov says that Sergeyev had no doubt that the entire Romanov family had been massacred in the Romanov house. The information that Sergeyev has supposed have given differs in the two sources. Also in Source D, Medvedev, the closest to an eyewitness, also claims that the entire family were shot and killed in the house. Although Sources A and B are similar, there reasons other than reliability for this. Source B is similar to Source A because Sergeyev showed Eliot around the house and may have influenced him. I also believed that Source A maybe unreliable because other sources about this disagree with it. In Source C it says that Sergeyev said the opposite thing to Source A and in Source D, Medvedev, says all the Romanov were killed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE George Eliot section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE George Eliot essays

  1. Mary Anne Evans, better known as "George Eliot," was born on November 22nd, 1819, ...

    She had, however, already amassed quite a library of her own by this time. In addition to her private studies, she was now also able to have masters to instruct her in a variety of subjects. The Rev. T. Sheepshanks, headmaster of the Coventry Grammar-school, gave her lessons in Greek

  2. To what extent do you agree that social and moral analysis is required of ...

    Reading this quotation, without knowing which of her books they were talking about, we could easily interpret it to have been about "Middlemarch," for in "Middlemarch" George Eliot analyses the motives and principles of characters in great depth, possibly even more so than she did in "The Mill on the Floss."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work