What seems to you to be the difference between Innocence and Experience in the poems that you have read?

Authors Avatar

What seems to you to be the difference between Innocence and Experience in the poems that you have read?

"The idyllic world of Innocence is exposed as naÏve and foolish by the subversive cynicism of Experience." The world of Innocence is happy and loving, and can be compared to Arcadia and the Garden of Eden, the place of true innocence and lack of knowledge. However, Experience is actual reality of what living in the real world is actually like, where people have experienced the problems in the world. They are aware of these problems due to experience. However, the world of Innocence encompasses no such problems, and so Experience sees it as "naÏve and foolish", as it is not prepared for life. Whereas Innocence is all about the love of God, fertility and joy, Experience is about jealousy, selfishness and general cold-heartedness.

Love, in Innocence, is portrayed as happiness and unity between humans and with the divine and nature, with God coming alive with divine love. Love is seen as something very special, with it being closely linked to happiness and harmony.

Join now!

As we heard from our previous presentation, in Exprerience love is not credited at all.

The narrator refuses the offer of sex, however, his wife, represented by the rose, turns her back on him, revealing the possessive jealous love that destroys true love.

Unselfish love cannot survive in Experience and this is shown in The Clod & the Pebble, in which unselfish love is trodden on by a material world. Despite the true harmony shown in poems, such as The Echoing Green, this is just passed off by Experience, which considers it to be both naÏve and foolish, as ...

This is a preview of the whole essay