What social institutions does George Orwell attack in 'Animal Farm'? How and why?

Authors Avatar

What social institutions does George Orwell attack in ‘Animal Farm’? How and why?

‘Animal Farm’ is a novel from the 1950’s. It was written as a reaction to the major social and political changes occurring in Europe and throughout the world in the first half of the twentieth century. The greatest of these was communism, which was a revolutionary brand of socialism that had taken hold in Russia. Orwell agreed with the principles of Communism, which promoted equality and the removal of social classes. However, he recognised that it would not work in practice, as it had not in Russia under Stalin, because of human nature.

The novel details the history of Communism in Russia, from the revolution to the height of Stalin’s regime, through a parallel fiction about a farm where the animals rise up and take over. Through this allegory, Orwell can criticise several social institutions that are relevant to most societies. He comments on the nature of leadership, hierarchies of social class and methods of controlling the people. Characters in the novel become symbolic, representing many ideas and figures from history.

Orwell is critical of all types of leadership in the novel. Farmer Jones owns the farm before the revolution. He is weak and a drunkard who lets the farm deteriorate and neglects the animals in his charge. They are not fed properly and in the first paragraph of the novel we learn he is too drunk to lock up the poultry for the night hence putting their lives in danger.

Quote

 The farm before the revolution is symbolic of a state that is governed autocratically, or by a monarch. Such leaders achieve their position by inheritance rather than merit or ability to do the job. If that individual holds ultimate responsibility and is weak and not respected, then this has a serious impact on the people in his charge. Orwell also uses the character of Jones as a warning that such a style of leadership is open to abuse and exploitation and there are inevitable consequences. Jones’s  life is comfortable, as were the lives of the landowners and aristocracy in pre revolutionary Russia. Meanwhile, the serfs starved. The natural consequence of this situation, where the masses become increasingly resentful of their leaders, is rebellion and ultimately the overthrow of the existing government. Throughout history this situation has repeated itself, pre-Nazi Germany, Ethiopia in the 1970’s and the French Revolution  are all examples of this.

Join now!

However, Orwell is equally critical of alternative styles of leadership. Snowball and Napoleon in the novel engineer the revolution and assume the dominant leadership positions. Marx, in his communist manifesto stated that it was necessary that a state, immediately after a revolution, would need a strong, authoritarian government to stabilise the country before full communism could take place. In Revolutionary Russia Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin took this role. Lenin was charismatic, a rousing speaker and inspired the serfs who were renamed the proletariat. Trotsky was similar to Lenin and both upheld the ideals of communism and wanted to make ...

This is a preview of the whole essay