Why Did Arthur Miller Call His Play 'The Crucible'?

Authors Avatar

Why Did Arthur Miller Call His Play ‘The Crucible’?

This modern play was written in the 1950’s by the author Arthur Miller. It is set in Salem, Massachusetts in North America. The story is about a town overcome by superstition of witches.

A Crucible is also a piece of equipment used in science. This piece of apparatus is used to separate the metal purities from the impurities. Salem is like a crucible in science because in the play, it separates the pure characters from the impure characters. Miller uses the name Crucible as a metaphor.

Miller wrote this play because of what was going on in his time. He linked his emotions to the Salem Witch Trials. In his time America was in war with Russia and was frightened of each other’s nuclear capabilities. America was a capitalist country and Russia was a Communist country along with China.

America was frightened of communism. Senator Joseph McCarthy was appointed as chairman of the House of Un-American Activities Committee to try and prevent communism spreading in America. He began to accuse many people of having left wing views along with many people accusing others. Miller was a liberal and was accused of being a communist because of his left wing views. He was furious at this and was reminded of the Salem Witch Trials 1692. He decided to write ‘The Crucible’ to convey the stupidity of the anti-communist hysteria. Miller wanted us to think about the stupid accusations during The Witch Trials and think that innocent people died for nothing but just for revenge or jealousy.

The moral of the story is to not prejudge people or support something because of a majority of people already supporting it.

I think we did see the play as Miller Wanted us to because we (the readers) did feel for the innocent characters and we did understand that what was going on was wrong.

I think that Miller didn’t want us to agree with any of McCarthy’s views because he made McCarthy look bad and you could maybe compare him with Hitler and other people who hurt other people for no reason except prejudice.

In the play Salem is the Crucible (in scientific sense) and the characters are the substances. The Crucible is supposed to separate the pure from the impure substances, so in Salem, this separates the pure characters from the impure characters. This also links with McCarthyism because, in Miller’s time, people were separated into pure and impure characters in which the pure characters were people that stood up for their own view and the impure who went with the majority of people.

A text I think is alike with this, according to the moral of the story is ‘Romeo and Juliet’. In both texts people were separated into ‘pure’ and ‘impure’ characters e.g. the parents of Romeo and Juliet are impure because they keep fighting with each other for no reason apart from their reputation. Also Romeo and Juliet are the pure characters throughout the

play because they still stood up for what they believed in even though their families were rivals.

Some characters start off at the beginning being pure but at the end they are impure.

One character that depicts this is Abigail. She was seen as pure at the beginning because she is shown being an innocent young girl that was used by John Proctor.

Join now!

Later on, I thought she was impure because of what she did to get revenge on Goody Proctor because of her jealousy and because Proctor chose his wife over her.

Miller makes Abigail say stuff like ‘I will never hurt Betty’ and ‘Now Betty, dear’.

This shows her character as being caring and innocent and like she only wants to do things that are right and doesn’t want to do anything the bible forbids. However she seems to be innocent but she isn’t because she still slept with a married man. Miller makes us prejudge her and we get ...

This is a preview of the whole essay