• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why is Arthur Millers play called The Crucible?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why is Arthur Miller's play called 'The Crucible'? The definition of a 'crucible' is a melting pot, which under extreme heat and pressure will separate pure and impure, or another equally relevant definition of a crucible is an extreme trial or test. Both of these definitions fulfil the metaphorical purpose of the play. The play is set in the 17th century, in the strictly Puritan society of Salem, Massachusetts. Where young girls try to practise witchcraft and are caught. This slowly spreads to the shifting of blame and the start of the witch-hunts, where in which church officials and court officials (Hale and Danforth) are called into to Salem to investigate the possible witchcraft. This step into mass-hysteria turns even the most Christian of members of Salem to crumble under false accusations, thus causing confessions and elaborate lies spiralling ever deeper to escape the fear of death. The guilty do anything to clear their names, even to the lengths of condemning innocent and well-respected members of the community to hang. This shows the link to McCarthyism in which under the fear of communism, hundred of people in post-WWII America were accused of being communist or communist sympathisers. ...read more.

Middle

Elizabeth Proctor in the play is depicted as a good Christian wife who follows all of the Ten Commandments. This is also enforced through John Proctor telling Danforth that Elizabeth would never lie: 'In her life, sir, she have never lie.' But due to the pressures of the trial and her love for her husband she lies to Danforth to protect her husband from his act of lechery, but unbeknown to her, John wants her to confess. The pressure and intensity of this court scene also displays connections to the theme of high temperatures. Also this leads on to the fact of John being a sinner and explores his dilemma through the trials of lechery. He had an affair with Abigail, who was at the time his servant. This sin causes John a great deal of guilt, and regret. He feels guilt for betraying his wife, and anguish as she knows about it and some how does not fully trust him until the witch hunt trials, this is shown in Act Two when they are both in the kitchen: 'He gets up, goes to her, kisses her. She receives it.' In the Puritans society follow the bible is of the utmost importance. ...read more.

Conclusion

John Proctor is an ambiguous character as he is impure in the sense that he sinned in committing adultery, but all throughout the play his character is quite pure, as he defends his wife and friends again false accusations, and in the end dies to prove the point of the court being wrong. So in a way he dies a martyr and 'rises to the top of the crucible'. But there is a sense on irony in this metaphor as in the end of the play; the court and the girls (impure) are the people who are left untouched and unaccused, but the pure characters such as John and Rebecca and the other innocent people who were charged ended up hanged and dead. This suggests that somewhat the impure should rise to the top of the crucible and the pure should sink to the bottom. In conclusion, the definition of a 'crucible' directly shows a metaphorical link to many parts and emotive features of the play. The play was called 'the Crucible' because of the clear relevance to most of the themes and issues that the play explores. The title is very effective due the fact it is provocative and encourages you to reflect on the play, its meaning and also its contemporary truth. Words count: 1269 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Is John Proctor a Good Man in Arthur Miller's Crucible?

    In this scene Proctor is shown to be a flawed man who allows his pride and fear get in the way of him doing the right thing just like in the McCarthy regime. The flaws show Proctor to not be a good man since he lets his guilt for his

  2. The Crucible - summary.

    When he discusses finding Abigail and Betty dancing in the woods, his concern is not the sin that they committed but rather the possibility that his enemies may use this sin against him. Parris will manifest a sharp paranoia concerning possible enemies, even when they may not exist.

  1. The Crucible.

    Miller wrote the drama in the 1950s, surrounded by bigotry and fear and therefore these problems are evident in The Crucible. According to Marion L Starkey (1949), in Salem, only twenty witches were executed, a microscopic number compared to the millions who have died in the species of witch-hunt peculiar to our own times.

  2. Essay on 'The Crucible'

    She accuses Proctor for having used her for the devil's work and runs into the now welcoming arms of Abigail. Proctor and Giles Corey are led to the prison. Language is extremely powerful in 'The Crucible'. Miller's words are used effectively and do not include anything unnecessary to convey the idea.

  1. Crucible : tension fear and hysteria

    hanged and forces Mary to tell the courts that they were just playing and that's all, but she begs him not to because she fears that Abigail will "curse" her. "I cannot charge murder on Abigail...she'll kill me for sayin' that!"

  2. Dramatic tension is created by Miller throughout the Crucible in many ways. Straightaway, the ...

    Elizabeth describes to John about Giles gruesome death, Giles showed his loyalty until the very end of his role in the play ordering the foul people to give him "more weight" so he can die with honour. There are many parts of the play where the audience sees John Proctor's loyalty.

  1. Does Arthur Miller's Commentary on 'The Crucible' help or hinder our understanding of the ...

    But some of the characters switch sides as the play goes on, at the beginning of the play I found Reverend Hale was very annoying. However as the play developed he was one of the people who could see sense in the situation.

  2. The Crucible - review

    When Proctor was brought in he admitted to lechery, the courtroom was chaotic. However, when Elizabeth was brought in, there is a lot of contrast in the atmosphere and when she is talking. When Danforth tells Elizabeth to look into his eyes only, she replies (faintly)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work