With close reference to the short-stories you have studied, compare the ways in which the writers use style and structure to maintain their reader(TM)s interest.

Authors Avatar
With close reference to the short-stories you have studied, compare the ways in which the writers use style and structure to maintain their reader's interest.

The short stories I will talk about were written around a hundred years ago in the 1890's. Short stories were very necessary in this century as TV's and radios were not available, and reading was the main source of entertainment. You must remember that Victorian ideas of entertainment were very different to ours, as there was a lot of interest in reading then.

These short stories followed a traditional structure, an exposition, complication, climax and resolution. The purpose of which, are as follows; the exposition sets the scene and introduces characters, the complication builds up tension as the problem is introduced, the climax is the most exiting part as the problem is introduced, the climax is the most exiting part as the problem escalates and finally the resolution solves the problems and usually ends happily.

The three stories I will discuss are 'The Yellow Face' by Arthur Conan Doyle, a story of mistrust and mystery with Sherlock Holmes. The 'Tell Tale Heart' by Edgar Allen Poe a madman's story, thinking he is a victim of an evil eye, and lastly 'The Sea Raiders' by H.G Wells, a retired tea sellers brutal encounter with two sea monsters.

The Exposition of 'The Sea Raiders' commences with a low level of excitement similar to the level of excitement in a traditional short story. However the lengthy sentences and factual information differs from a traditional short story as it would normally contain expressive language with many adjectives to amuse their reader and immerse them in the story. Due to the amount of scientific language in the exposition, the excitement level had dropped 'Haploteuthis Ferox was known to science only generically' this quote does not grasp the reader's attention as it is mainly providing you with facts. It also does not seem to contain any descriptive language, therefore lowering the excitement level of the reader as well, as the content of adjectives was very important in order to excite the reader. There are also various long sentences in the exposition, 'In no particular department of zoological science, indeed have we been quite so much in the dark, as with regards to the deep sea cethalopods', this neither grasps the readers attention, nor raises the excitement of the reader as the pace is very slow. It also has many long scientific words which also disinterest the reader as well. H.G Wells also uses many commas in each sentence which slows the reader while reading it, therefore causing the slow pace.

However H.G Wells also uses these techniques to engage his reader, as the use of factual language can also interest readers as well such as 'found early in 1896 by Mr Jennings near Lands End'. By making the exposition more factual it results in the entire story being more believable, as we are convinced by what the narrator is saying and therefore we begin to trust the narrator throughout the whole of the story.

By using exact dates, specific places, and detailed facts, it gives the idea to the reader that a news reporter may be narrating 'In the summer of 1895' here the narrator is describing the setting and time just as a news reporter would. However it may also be the fact, that a scientist is narrating, 'These specimens were cethalopods, fragments of cethalopods...all of them known the science', the scientific language used, names of creatures and the mention of science itself persuades the reader into thinking the narrator may be a scientist as he analyses Mr Fison's ordeal, and attempts to discover the monstrous sea creatures. I also feel he may be a scientist as he names many different cases of the mystery such as 'Hemley's Theory' he also seems quite intrigued at how Mr Fison survived this ordeal as he was the first person to survive an attack from these creatures. Lastly I feel the narrator may be a detective as he reports many cases of death, 'A decaying body ...found early in 1896' this language is quite specific, it seems as if he is investigating Mr Fison's ordeal. I also think this, as many factual and precise writing is given in the story.
Join now!


Whoever the reader assumes the narrator to be, the certainty is that H G Wells has not used Mr Fison, the main character. If Mr Fison was narrating he wouldn't have known the names of the sea creatures, dates, times or any scientific language to make the story seem convincing. He is a tea-dealer and wouldn't know the correct language, as a news reporter, scientist or detective would. The use of factual and believable language may have lowered the level of excitement for a modern reader. However, an 1800's reader would be drawn to such a story as ...

This is a preview of the whole essay