Write to argue for or against mobile phones being allowed in school

Authors Avatar

Imagine your sat down in a classroom, all is quiet, when

suddenly a reppettetive and rhymic ringtone slices

through the peace and suddenly the class is in an uproar. This is a

problem faced by many teachers in many classrooms across the country.

This disturbance not only interrupts the teacher but also effects

the education and learning cycle of countless children. This is why I make the proposal that mobile phones should be banned.

Join now!

Outright. The problems they cause are undeniable, and therefore I

propose that you have been hassled by half thought pleas that pupils can switch them off or turn them on silent, and I am sure that if this were the rule many would agree.

However it is inevitable that those lacking a sense of responsibility will

ignore and ‘flaunt these rules, and so even if there are not as many occurances of phones going off, there are still some! Others have argued that they should be left in bags or lockers, which could solve the problem. However how long ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

The Quality of Written Communication (QWC) is fair but some areas do not properly adhere to the rules of Standard English "Also teachers, or receptionists are always here to provide a phone if that situation arises" is not a proper sentences. The previous sentences requires a comma to link the quoted sentence to it. This is basic primary school grammar and should not be an issue for GCSE candidate. These errors need to be rectified with carefully proof-reading in order to make sure the QWC mark is as high as possible.

The Level of Argument is very high, but in some parts a result of this is that it is not very convincing. The candidate appears to be very pig-headed about their stance on mobile phones in school, and perhaps a compromise would've provided better balance as this argument does seem very one-sided, with the candidate rebuttals to counter-argument feeling very one-sided and ignorant. For instance, suggesting that parents and students should organise their day before school to avoid the need to phone in the case of an emergency or suggesting that phones are a primary cause of bullying undermines the intelligence of a student to be able to reasonably use their phones within permitted times such as break time or lunch time, so whilst the argument is impressive in the number of the techniques it uses, it would be better to see fewer techniques sued more appropriately and reasonably.

The essay here is a good attempt at a Writing to Argue task, and demonstrates a good level of knowledge on how to write an effective argument. I will say outright that the tone of the piece borders on hysterical and some of the argument appears fairly ignorant of more realistic concerns, with can often undermine the argument and make having a mobile phone on school premises not seem like such a bad idea. For this I recommend being slightly more concerned with a realistic argument that realises the unpredictability of life, no matter how pre-planned and predetermined it is (phones are to be used in an emergency would be a good compromise and a welcome balance in the essay). The essay's positives however are that it is written with a very firm hand, giving an indication of confidence and sincerity; it also utilises a number of linguistic rhetoric devices like alliteration, rhetorical questions, exemplary scenarios and Second Person address. All these help the effectiveness of the argument, as they engage the reader and propose the argument with force.