Justify responses where child maltreatment or abuse is suspected or confirmed, referring to current legislation and policies

Authors Avatar by miya123456789 (student)

UNIT 10 D2                  

Caring for children and young people

D2 Justify responses where child maltreatment or abuse is suspected or confirmed, referring to current legislation and policies

Child maltreatment can be very hard to see defiantly when there is no physical damage to the individual. However when there has been any suspicion or confirmed abuse or maltreatment cases certain response needs to take place to make sure the child’s safety is put first and that the right polices and legislations help in supporting the response to that certain abuse.

The Paramountcy principle is when the child’s welfare paramount in other words the child’s needs should be put first. This principle also states that there should be no delay when accounting for the child’s future. Courts should also not make an order unless they are absolutely in the child’s best interest to do so. This also applies to other health and social care settings as they work with children. For example a school always need to make sure the subjects they are educating the pupils in it is in their best interest and will help them in the future. This links to justifying the response to abuse and maltreatment of a child because every child should be given priority over all other problems. Responding to child maltreatment and abuse needs to be quick and significant help.    

In the Children Act (1989) states that “better for the child than making no order at all” (section 1). This legislation is set out to protect the welfare of children in any circumstances. In (section 47) of the legislation it says that if there has been a  reasonable cause to suspect that a child who lives, or is found, in their area is suffering, or is likely to suffer, significant harm there is a duty to investigate. This is the first step in responding to a child being maltreated or abused. The Children Act (1989) is the main body of the Paramountcy principles and is a key legislation that helps in ways to respond to child abuse and maltreatment. The Children Act has been updated in (2004)

Some examples where there was no response to the child maltreatment and abuse are baby Peter Connelly, Victoria Climbie and Sarah Payne. These three children with deprived from the appropriate response and where failed from the Paramountcy principles as all the children’s rights where not put in the best interest. Also in the case of Victoria Climbie she was admitted to health care services many times and no investigations took place. Following the death of eight-year old Victoria Climbié in 2000, the Government asked Lord Laming to conduct an inquiry to help decide whether it needed to introduce new legislation and guidance to improve the child protection system in England. The new and improved legislation was the Children Act (2004).

When a child is abused and there is a suspicion of abuse it would have been due to direct or indirect disclosure. This is the child says something directly about being abused or neglected. This can be done in many ways as the child may say I will tell you under certain conditions or they may be telling a person about them being abused but in third person. For example a girl that I know is getting abused.  

Whereas indirect disclosure consists of the child trying to hide the fact that there getting abused but there are clear signs of abuse or maltreatment. For example   verbal hints that appear to be about abuse, written hints that appear to be about abuse like a diary or a drawing or it could be through physical disfigurement such as bruising cuts and broken bones. The awareness of the different ways abuse and maltreatment need to be understood so that the response to the abuse or maltreatment can quickly start.

Join now!

The first response that will be justified is listening carefully and attentively to a child while they disclose information to an individual. This response allows the child to feel listened to and lets them know that they are being taken serious in whatever they are disclosing. During the time of discloser the witness of it should take down a record to make sure that nothing is missed out and also stops the child having to repeat themselves.

This response links to the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act (2006) legeslation.co.uk (2012) this legislation helps in emphasising the importance of the care ...

This is a preview of the whole essay