An evaluation, comparing and contrasting King's themes and techniques with Woodgate's.

Authors Avatar
An evaluation, comparing and contrasting King's themes and techniques with Woodgate's.

Woodgate chose the topic of conflict between today's youths as it is a issue about which he feels passionate and which the audience and later readers could relate to and understand.

'We need to fight this oppression, which has now become an everyday occurrence in our society.' Woodgate's techniques are very similar to King's, however, I feel that King's unwavering certainty and ambition in his dynamic and influential vocabulary is more effective in motivating the audience and later readers, 'As we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall march ahead. We cannot turn back!'

Both Woodgate and King have a plentiful supply of imagery in their speeches to grasp attention and create interest. Woodgate describes the hostility and jeering as 'vicious, rabid hyenas' and similarly, King depicts racial injustices as "quicksands" in "the valley of despair."
Join now!


King's "Promised Land" speech contrasts dramatically with his 'I have a dream' speech and Woodgate's "We shall overcome" speech. He appears to be telling almost a life story - it seems to be sombre and apprehensive, "I may not get there with you" and "But it doesn't matter with me now." 'Did he know he was going to get killed?" These were the enquiring words of M.E. Dyson who wrote a biography of King.

In the last paragraph of "The Promised Land", King's sentences are short and abrupt, contrasting from the eloquent, flowing prose of the rest ...

This is a preview of the whole essay