Cause of World War 1

Authors Avatar

World War 1 Causes Essay

Q: “Nationalistic fervour was responsible for the outbreak of war.” Do you agree with this statement? Argue your case.

        Nationalistic fervour was indeed responsible for the outbreak of war, as all the main causes of the war stem from the ideals of nationalism. There are two notable definitions of what nationalism means that can help historians determine what nationalism is. The Macquarie Dictionary defines nationalism as “the desire for national advancement of independence” and the World Book 2001 defines it as “wanting the best for a nation one is affiliated with.” From these two definitions, as historians, we can link all the main causes of World War One to nationalistic fervour. Colonialism of Africa and the crises in Morocco added to tensions between Germany, Britain and France. The tensions in the Balkans coupled with the assassination of Franz Ferdinand all came from the thoughts of Serbian nationalism. The countries that were part of the alliance system and the treaties that went with the balance of power also wanted the best for their nation. The arms race and German militarism was a competition between Germany and Britain to have the best military, trade and empire. All the main causes of the Great War are all linked to nationalistic fervour in some way.

        Colonialism in Africa and the crises of 1905 and 1911 in Morocco certainly added to the nationalistic fervour responsible for the outbreak of war. Tensions rose from the competition to colonise the countries of Africa. The demand for an empire for the mother country grew and grew, as the people of the country wanted needed more resources, and needed the land to exploit it. To soothe the tensions between the two countries, Britain and France signed an entente in 1904 to help solve such colonial disputes. When the Kaiser of Germany made a speech in Morocco, supporting independence for Morocco, this added further strains on the relationship of France and Germany. France was outraged by this speech and at the international conference at Algerciras in 1906, Britain and France quashed the Kaiser and Germany’s aspirations of an empire in Africa and international status. In 1911, the Kaiser again interfered into the French colonisation of Morocco by sending a gunboat (the Panther) to protect its trade interests in Morocco. The British were fearful of their own interests at its naval base at Agadir, so was thus scared of German ships affecting its trade in the Mediterranean. To compensate, Britain and France gave Germany land in central Africa. But Germany wanted more. Nationalistic fervour was alive and well in Germany on the issues of colonialism and Morocco was a clear example of this. The tensions that emerged from this however became a major link to the Great War.

Join now!

        The alliance system, the treaties that brought these alliances about and the balance of power in Europe are all reasons to why World War One started. But are they linked to nationalistic fervour? Many historians would say no, but under the definition given by the two sources in the introduction, I would say yes. The countries signed treaties and formed alliances to make their nation better, but also to solve disputes. The alliance system of Britain, France and Russia versus Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy came about because of colonial tensions and treaties to solve international disputes peacefully. Britain had ...

This is a preview of the whole essay